Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32731355›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Study of the Female Sex Survival Advantage in Melanoma-A Focus on X-Linked Epigenetic Regulators and Immune Responses in Two Cohorts.

Abdullah Al Emran, Jérémie Nsengimana, Gaya Punnia-Moorthy, Ulf Schmitz, Stuart J Gallagher, Julia Newton-Bishop, Jessamy C Tiffen, Peter Hersey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. X and Y Differences in Melanoma Survival Between the Sexes.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dual Targeting with EZH2 Inhibitor and STING Agonist to Treat Melanoma.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. SDC: An integrated database for sex differences in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdullah Al EmranMelanoma Oncology and Immunology Program, The Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5518-6605
Jérémie NsengimanaLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-4208
Gaya Punnia-MoorthyMelanoma Oncology and Immunology Program, The Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-370X
Ulf SchmitzComputational Biomedicine Lab Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-4662
Stuart J GallagherMelanoma Oncology and Immunology Program, The Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-9671
Julia Newton-BishopLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jessamy C TiffenMelanoma Oncology and Immunology Program, The Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.
Peter HerseyMelanoma Oncology and Immunology Program, The Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10589Cancer Research UK 11963Cancer Research UK 19167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival from melanoma is strongly related to patient sex, with females having a survival rate almost twice that of males. Many explanations have been proposed but have not withstood critical scrutiny. Prior analysis of different cancers with a sex bias has identified six X-linked genes that escape X chromosome inactivation in females and are, therefore, potentially involved in sex differences in survival. Four of the genes are well-known epigenetic regulators that are known to influence the expression of hundreds of other genes and signaling pathways in cancer.

methodsSurvival and interaction analysis were performed on the skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), comparing high vs. low expression of

resultsAnalysis of TCGA data revealed that two of these genes-

conclusionWhen considered together, the results from these two series are consistent with the involvement of X-linked epigenetic regulators in the improved survival of females from melanoma. The identification of gene signatures associated with their expression presents insights into the development of new treatment initiatives but provides a basis for exploration in future studies.

Indexed as

epigenetic regulatorsEZH2 inhibitorGSEAhistone demethylaseimmune responseLMCmelanomasex differenceSKCMsurvivalTCGAX chromosome inactivationX-linked genes

Identifiers

PMID32731355
PMCPMC7464825
OpenAlexW3045873797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.