ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Co-phosphorylation networks reveal subtype-specific signaling modules in breast cancer.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergence of Catalytic Activity in VRK3: Phosphoproteomic Insights into the Regulatory Network of a Former Pseudokinase.Proteomes · 2026Review
- Deciphering the dark cancer phosphoproteome using machine-learned co-regulation of phosphosites.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Functional characterization of co-phosphorylation networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationProtein phosphorylation is a ubiquitous mechanism of post-translational modification that plays a central role in cellular signaling. Phosphorylation is particularly important in the context of cancer, as downregulation of tumor suppressors and upregulation of oncogenes by the dysregulation of associated kinase and phosphatase networks are shown to have key roles in tumor growth and progression. Despite recent advances that enable large-scale monitoring of protein phosphorylation, these data are not fully incorporated into such computational tasks as phenotyping and subtyping of cancers.
resultsWe develop a network-based algorithm, CoPPNet, to enable unsupervised subtyping of cancers using phosphorylation data. For this purpose, we integrate prior knowledge on evolutionary, structural and functional association of phosphosites, kinase-substrate associations and protein-protein interactions with the correlation of phosphorylation of phosphosites across different tumor samples (a.k.a co-phosphorylation) to construct a context-specific-weighted network of phosphosites. We then mine these networks to identify subnetworks with correlated phosphorylation patterns. We apply the proposed framework to two mass-spectrometry-based phosphorylation datasets for breast cancer (BC), and observe that (i) the phosphorylation pattern of the identified subnetworks are highly correlated with clinically identified subtypes, and (ii) the identified subnetworks are highly reproducible across datasets that are derived from different studies. Our results show that integration of quantitative phosphorylation data with network frameworks can provide mechanistic insights into the differences between the signaling mechanisms that drive BC subtypes. Furthermore, the reproducibility of the identified subnetworks suggests that phosphorylation can provide robust classification of disease response and markers. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CoPPNet is available at http://compbio.case.edu/coppnet/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.