Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32730571›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Beef trait genetic parameters based on old and recent data and its implications for genomic predictions in Italian Simmental cattle.

Alberto Cesarani, Jorge Hidalgo, Andre Garcia, Lorenzo Degano, Daniele Vicario, Yutaka Masuda, Ignacy Misztal, Daniela Lourenco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of genomic breeding values and accuracy for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cows using whole-genome SNP chip panels.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberto CesaraniDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Jorge HidalgoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Andre GarciaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Lorenzo DeganoAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Bovini di Razza Pezzata Rossa Italiana, Udine, Italy.
Daniele VicarioAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Bovini di Razza Pezzata Rossa Italiana, Udine, Italy.
Yutaka MasudaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Ignacy MisztalDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in variance components over time to identify a subset of data from the Italian Simmental (IS) population that would yield the most appropriate estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values for beef traits to select young bulls. Data from bulls raised between 1986 and 2017 were used to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for four beef traits (average daily gain [ADG], body size [BS], muscularity [MUS], and feet and legs [FL]). The phenotypic mean increased during the years of the study for ADG, but it decreased for BS, MUS, and FL. The complete dataset (ALL) was divided into four generational subsets (Gen1, Gen2, Gen3, and Gen4). Additionally, ALL was divided into two larger subsets: the first one (OLD) combined data from Gen1 and Gen2 to represent the starting population, and the second one (CUR) combined data from Gen3 and Gen4 to represent a subpopulation with stronger ties to the current population. Genetic parameters were estimated with a four-trait genomic animal model using a single-step genomic average information restricted maximum likelihood algorithm. Heritability estimates from ALL were 0.26 ± 0.03 for ADG, 0.33 ± 0.04 for BS, 0.55 ± 0.03 for MUS, and 0.23 ± 0.03 for FL. Higher heritability estimates were obtained with OLD and ALL than with CUR. Considerable changes in heritability existed between Gen1 and Gen4 due to fluctuations in both additive genetic and residual variances. Genetic correlations also changed over time, with some values moving from positive to negative or even to zero. Genetic correlations from OLD were stronger than those from CUR. Changes in genetic parameters over time indicated that they should be updated regularly to avoid biases in genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) and low selection accuracies. GEBV estimated using CUR variance components were less biased and more consistent than those estimated with OLD and ALL variance components. Validation results indicated that data from recent generations produced genetic parameters that more appropriately represent the structure of the current population, yielding accurate GEBV to select young animals and increasing the likelihood of higher genetic gains.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsBreedingCattleGenomeGenotypeItalyMaleModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypecattlegenetic correlationgenomicsingle-step approachvariance components

Identifiers

PMID32730571
PMCPMC7431209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.