Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32730302›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Local anesthesia in piglets undergoing castration-A comparative study to investigate the analgesic effects of four local anesthetics on the basis of acute physiological responses and limb movements.

Anna M Saller, Julia Werner, Judith Reiser, Steffanie Senf, Pauline Deffner, Nora Abendschön, Christine Weiß, Johannes Fischer, Andrea Schörwerth, Regina Miller and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna M SallerCenter of Preclinical Research, Technical University of Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Julia WernerCenter of Preclinical Research, Technical University of Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-5374
Judith ReiserCenter of Preclinical Research, Technical University of Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Steffanie SenfClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4463-078X
Pauline DeffnerClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Nora AbendschönClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Christine WeißClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Johannes FischerCenter of Preclinical Research, Technical University of Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Andrea SchörwerthChair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Husbandry, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Regina MillerChair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Husbandry, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Yury ZablotskiClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Shana BergmannChair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Husbandry, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9888-653X
Michael H ErhardChair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Husbandry, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Mathias RitzmannClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Susanne ZölsClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Christine BaumgartnerCenter of Preclinical Research, Technical University of Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-5099
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical castration of male piglets without analgesia is a painful procedure. This prospective, randomized and double-blinded study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects of four different local anesthetics for piglet castration during the first week of life. In total, 54 piglets aged 3 to 7 days were distributed into 6 treatment groups: handling (H); castration without pain relief (sodium chloride, NaCl); and castration with a local anesthetic: 4% procaine (P), 2% lidocaine (L), 0.5% bupivacaine (B) or 20 mg/ml mepivacaine (M). By excluding stress and fear as disruptive factors via a minimum anesthesia model, all piglets received individual minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) isoflurane anesthesia. Twenty minutes before castration, all treatment groups except group H received one injection per testis. Then, 0.5 ml of a local anesthetic or NaCl was injected intratesticularly (i.t.), and 0.5 ml was administered subscrotally. Acute physiological responses to noxious stimuli at injection and castration were evaluated by measuring blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine and chromogranin A (CgA); limb movements were quantified. The results confirm that castration without analgesia is highly painful. Surgical castration without pain relief revealed significant changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and HR. Local anesthetic administration significantly reduced changes in BP and HR associated with castration. Piglets receiving a preoperative local anesthetic exhibited the fewest limb movements during castration, while the NaCl group exhibited the most. Injection itself was not associated with significant changes in MAP or HR. However, many piglets exhibited limb movements during injection, indicating that the injection itself causes nociceptive pain. No significant differences were found between groups regarding parameters of plasma cortisol, catecholamines and CgA. In conclusion, all four local anesthetics administered are highly effective at reducing signs of nociception during castration under light isoflurane anesthesia. However, injection of a local anesthetic seems to be painful.

Indexed as

Blood PressureMovementAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, LocalAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCastrationCatecholaminesExtremitiesHeart RateHydrocortisoneMaleSwineAnesthetics, LocalCatecholaminesHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID32730302
PMCPMC7392247
OpenAlexW3046440438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.