Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32729979›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2021

Safety evaluation of the canine osteosarcoma vaccine, live Listeria vector.

Margaret L Musser, Erika P Berger, Chelsea D Tripp, Craig A Clifford, Philip J Bergman, Chad M Johannes

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combined radiation andMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Osteosarcoma: current insights and advances.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Translational History and Hope of Immunotherapy of Canine Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret L MusserCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4350-0614
Erika P BergerCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Chelsea D TrippOncology Service, Bridge Animal Referral Center, Edmonds, Washington, USA.
Craig A CliffordOncology Service, Hope Veterinary Specialists, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA.
Philip J BergmanVCA Katonah Bedford Veterinary Center, Clinical Studies and Oncology Service, Bedford Hills, New York, USA.
Chad M JohannesCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Iowa State University · USBuilding Bridges · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOncology Specialists · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine osteosarcoma (OSA) is an aggressive bone tumour in dogs. Standard-of-care treatment typically results in relatively short survival times; thus, alternative treatments are needed to confer a survival advantage. It has been shown that OSA is an immunogenic tumour, suggesting that immune modulation may result in superior outcomes. A cryopreserved, Listeria-based OSA vaccine was recently developed and an initial study in dogs reported prolonged survival for patients receiving the vaccine in conjunction with standard-of-care. The goal of the current observational study was to report on the safety of the lyophilized formulation of this vaccine (the canine OSA vaccine, live Listeria vector [COV-LLV]) in a group of dogs previously diagnosed with OSA. Forty-nine (49) dogs received the COV-LLV and were included for analysis. Adverse events (AEs) noted during and after vaccinations were recorded. The AEs observed were typically mild and self-limiting, with nausea, lethargy and fever being most common. Four dogs (8%) cultured positive for Listeria (three infections including an amputation site abscess, septic stifle joint and bacterial cystitis; and one dog whose lungs cultured Listeria-positive on necropsy within 24 hours of COV-LLV administration). These cases join the previously reported Listeria-positive thoracic abscess that developed in a canine following use of COV-LLV. Although uncommon, it is important to realize this clinically significant AE is possible in patients treated with live therapeutic Listeria vaccines. As Listeria is zoonotic, caution is required not only for the patient receiving the vaccine, but also for the health care workers and family caring for the patient.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesDog DiseasesDogsGenetic VectorsListeriaOsteosarcomaCancer Vaccinescancer vaccinesdogsimmunotherapyListeria monocytogeneslisteriosis

Identifiers

PMID32729979
PMCPMC7891610
OpenAlexW3046523013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.