Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32729973›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2020

Ascertaining properties of weighting in the estimation of optimal treatment regimes under monotone missingness.

Lin Dong, Eric Laber, Yair Goldberg, Rui Song, Shu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin DongDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Eric LaberDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-7696
Yair GoldbergDepartment of Statistics, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Rui SongDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Shu YangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Statistical methods for healthcare in complex patients with diabetesR01DK108073 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHAO, YINGQI · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108073NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK-108073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes operationalize precision medicine as a sequence of decision rules, one per stage of clinical intervention, that map up-to-date patient information to a recommended intervention. An optimal treatment regime maximizes the mean utility when applied to the population of interest. Methods for estimating an optimal treatment regime assume the data to be fully observed, which rarely occurs in practice. A common approach is to first use multiple imputation and then pool the estimators across imputed datasets. However, this approach requires estimating the joint distribution of patient trajectories, which can be high-dimensional, especially when there are multiple stages of intervention. We examine the application of inverse probability weighted estimating equations as an alternative to multiple imputation in the context of monotonic missingness. This approach applies to a broad class of estimators of an optimal treatment regime including both Q-learning and a generalization of outcome weighted learning. We establish consistency under mild regularity conditions and demonstrate its advantages in finite samples using a series of simulation experiments and an application to a schizophrenia study.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPrecision MedicineComputer SimulationHumansProbabilityaugmented inverse probability weightingdynamic treatment regimesmonotonic coarsenessoutcome weighted learningQ-learning

Identifiers

PMID32729973
PMCPMC13077725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.