Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32729888›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2020

Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses and Regimens of Faricimab vs Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The AVENUE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jayashree Sahni, Pravin U Dugel, Sunil S Patel, Mark E Chittum, Brian Berger, Marta Del Valle Rubido, Shamil Sadikhov, Piotr Szczesny, Dietmar Schwab, Everson Nogoceke and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02484690 (A Multiple-Center, Multiple-Dose and Regimen, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, 36 Week Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RO6867461 Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02484690 phase2completednot on this map

A Multiple-Center, Multiple-Dose and Regimen, Randomized, Active Comparator Controlled, Double-Masked, Parallel Group, 36 Week Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of RO6867461 Administered Intravitreally in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2015 to 2017Enrolled273ConditionsChoroidal NeovascularizationArmsFaricimab, Ranibizumab, Sham Procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. One-year real-world data of intravitreal faricimab in patients with pre-treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Systemic and ocular complications related to intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF agents.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Efficacy of switching treatment to faricimab in recalcitrant neovascular age related macular degeneration - 6 month results after completion of the loading phase.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Anti-VEGF Agents Clearance Through the Aqueous Outflow Pathway in a Rat Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jayashree SahniRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Pravin U DugelRetinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix.
Sunil S PatelWest Texas Retina Consultants, Abilene.
Mark E ChittumRetina Consultants of Southern Colorado, Colorado Springs.
Brian BergerRetina Research Center, Austin, Texas.
Marta Del Valle RubidoRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Shamil SadikhovRoche Product Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Piotr SzczesnyRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Dietmar SchwabRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Everson NogocekeRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Robert WeikertRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Sascha FauserRoche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHRetinal Consultants of Arizona · USWest Texas Retina Consultants · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Faricimab, the first bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use, simultaneously and independently binds and neutralizes angiopoietin 2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of different doses and regimens of faricimab vs ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design, Setting, and Participants: AVENUE was a 36-week, multiple-dose-regimen, active comparator-controlled, double-masked, phase 2 randomized clinical study performed at 58 sites in the United States. Eligible participants were anti-VEGF treatment naive with choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 73 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/320). Data were collected from August 11, 2015, to January 12, 2017, with the final patient visit completed September 26, 2017. Data were analyzed from August 11, 2015, to October 4, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 3:2:2:2:3 to receive ranibizumab, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (arm A [n = 68]); faricimab, 1.5 mg every 4 weeks (arm B [n = 47]); faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (arm C [n = 42]); faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks until week 12, then faricimab, 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (arm D [n = 47]); and ranibizumab, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks until week 8, then faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (arm E [n = 69]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 36, proportion of participants gaining at least 15 letters, BCVA of 20/40 or better or 20/200 or worse, and ocular coherence tomographic outcomes in anti-VEGF treatment-naive participants (arms A, B, C, D) and from weeks 12 to 36 in those with incomplete response (participants in arms A and E with week 12 BCVA ETDRS letter score of ≤68 [Snellen equivalent, 20/50 or worse]). Results: A total of 263 participants were included in the analysis (172 [65.4%] female; 258 [98.1%] white; mean [SD] age, 78.3 [8.7] years). At week 36, adjusted mean change in BCVA vs ranibizumab was 1.6 (80% CI, -1.6 to 4.7) letters for arm B (P = .52), -1.6 (80% CI, -4.9 to 1.7) letters for arm C (P = .53), and -1.5 (80% CI, -4.6 to 1.6) letters for arm D (P = .53). For arm E, adjusted mean change from week 12 was -1.7 (80% CI, -3.8 to 0.4) letters (P = .30). Conclusions and Relevance: AVENUE did not meet its primary end point of superiority of faricimab over ranibizumab in BCVA at week 36. Although not superior to monthly ranibizumab as given in this trial, overall visual and anatomical gains noted with faricimab support pursuing phase 3 trials for a potential alternative to monthly anti-VEGF therapy. Faricimab showed no new or unexpected safety signals. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02484690.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID32729888
PMCPMC7393587
OpenAlexW3046726202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.