Observational studyHospital practice (1995)2020
Effects of patient-level noise abatement orders on sound levels experienced by critically ill subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: an observational study.
Observational study in Hospital practice (1995), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noise in the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review of Its Characteristics, Clinical Impact, and Reduction Strategies.Critical care research and practice · 2026Review
- Variability of environmental sound levels: An observational study from a general adult intensive care unit in the UK.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivePatients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may be at risk for complications related to excessive environmental noise. Our ICU utilizes a variety of universal interventions to minimize ambient noise levels, but patients with aSAH additionally have specific orders intended to further minimize physiologic stress and noise exposure. It is unknown whether such orders can have a supplementary reductive effect on noise exposure.
methodsSound levels were measured for at least three consecutive days in the rooms of 17 patients with aSAH and implemented 'subarachnoid precautions' orders. Sound levels were similarly recorded in the rooms of 11 geographically-proximate, critically-ill control patients without aSAH.
resultsLinear mixed models were used to assess the difference in measurements between groups. Observations were combined into fifteen-minute windows, then group means and their differences were calculated and plotted to help identify what times of the day had significant differences. aSAH patients consistently experienced lower sound levels than control patients, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean sound levels at 62 of 96 intervals throughout the day. Overall, the mean sound level for aSAH patients was always between 62-63dBA, while the mean sound level experienced by control patients ranged between 64-66dBA.
conclusionsImplementation of patient-specific orders can have a supplementary reductive effect on noise exposure for aSAH patients in an intensive care unit that already utilizes universal noise abatement interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.