Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32729090›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2020

Quantitative Serial CT Imaging-Derived Features Improve Prediction of Malignant Cerebral Edema after Ischemic Stroke.

Hossein Mohammadian Foroushani, Ali Hamzehloo, Atul Kumar, Yasheng Chen, Laura Heitsch, Agnieszka Slowik, Daniel Strbian, Jin-Moo Lee, Daniel S Marcus, Rajat Dhar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hossein Mohammadian ForoushaniDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, USA.
Ali HamzehlooDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8111, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Atul KumarDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8111, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Yasheng ChenDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8111, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Laura HeitschDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, USA.
Agnieszka SlowikDepartment of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Daniel StrbianDepartment of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jin-Moo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8111, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Daniel S MarcusDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, USA.
Rajat DharDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8111, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. dharr@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5167-5097
Washington University in St. Louis · USHelsinki University Hospital · FIJagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Genetic Architecture of Acute Human Brain IschemiaR01NS085419 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CRUCHAGA, CARLOS, LEE, JIN-MOO · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAICHLE, MARCUS E · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
GENETICS OF EARLY NEUROLOGICAL INSTABILITY AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE (GENISIS)K23NS099487 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HEITSCH, LAURA · 2017 to 2021
$996k
GENETICS AND PREDICTION OF CEREBRAL EDEMA AFTER HEMISPHERIC STROKEK23NS099440 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DHAR, RAJAT · 2017 to 2021
$890k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099440NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099487NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMalignant cerebral edema develops in a small subset of patients with hemispheric strokes, precipitating deterioration and death if decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is not performed in a timely manner. Predicting which stroke patients will develop malignant edema is imprecise based on clinical data alone. Head computed tomography (CT) imaging is often performed at baseline and 24-h. We determined the incremental value of incorporating imaging-derived features from serial CTs to enhance prediction of malignant edema.

methodsWe identified hemispheric stroke patients at three sites with NIHSS ≥ 7 who had baseline as well as 24-h clinical and CT imaging data. We extracted quantitative imaging features from baseline and follow-up CTs, including CSF volume, intracranial reserve (CSF/cranial volume), as well as midline shift (MLS) and infarct-related hypodensity volume. Potentially lethal malignant edema was defined as requiring DHC or dying with MLS over 5-mm. We built machine-learning models using logistic regression first with baseline data and then adding 24-h data including reduction in CSF volume (ΔCSF). Model performance was evaluated with cross-validation using metrics of recall (sensitivity), precision (predictive value), as well as area under receiver-operating-characteristic and precision-recall curves (AUROC, AUPRC).

resultsTwenty of 361 patients (6%) died or underwent DHC. Baseline clinical variables alone had recall of 60% with low precision (7%), AUROC 0.59, AUPRC 0.15. Adding baseline intracranial reserve improved recall to 80% and AUROC to 0.82 but precision remained only 16% (AUPRC 0.28). Incorporating ΔCSF improved AUPRC to 0.53 (AUROC 0.91) while all imaging features further improved prediction (recall 90%, precision 38%, AUROC 0.96, AUPRC 0.66).

conclusionIncorporating quantitative CT-based imaging features from baseline and 24-h CT enhances identification of patients with malignant edema needing DHC. Further refinements and external validation of such imaging-based machine-learning models are required.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaBrain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCerebral edemaImagingPrediction modelsRegressionStroke

Identifiers

PMID32729090
PMCPMC7738418
OpenAlexW3046167359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.