ArticleNeurocritical care2020
Quantitative Serial CT Imaging-Derived Features Improve Prediction of Malignant Cerebral Edema after Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive power of artificial intelligence for malignant cerebral edema in stroke patients: a CT-based systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and diagnostic performance.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning Models for Cerebral Edema Risk in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Malignant Cerebral Edema after Large-Core Anterior Circulation Stroke in the Thrombectomy Era: Prediction and Neurocritical Care Pathways.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Cerebrospinal fluid-based clinical-radiomics model for predicting treatment prognosis of acute ischemic stroke.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Predicting malignant cerebral edema after acute ischemic stroke: a machine-learning model with multi-region radiomics.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Early automated cerebral edema assessment following endovascular therapy: impact on stroke outcome.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025Article
- Association of large core middle cerebral artery stroke and hemorrhagic transformation with hospitalization outcomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CSF-Based Volumetric Imaging Biomarkers Highlight Incidence and Risk Factors for Cerebral Edema After Ischemic Stroke.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Predicting cerebral edema in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Analysis of brain edema in RHAPSODY.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Article
- Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- Role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Accelerating Prediction of Malignant Cerebral Edema After Ischemic Stroke with Automated Image Analysis and Explainable Neural Networks.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Automated quantitative lesion water uptake in acute stroke is a predictor of malignant cerebral edema.European radiology · 2022Article
- Commentary on "Midline Shift Greater than 3 mm Independently Predicts Outcome After Ischemic Stroke".Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- Medical management of cerebral edema in large hemispheric infarcts.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- MRI Radiomics Features From Infarction and Cerebrospinal Fluid for Prediction of Cerebral Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Machine Learning in Action: Stroke Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- The Stroke Neuro-Imaging Phenotype Repository: An Open Data Science Platform for Stroke Research.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byResponse.2020
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMalignant cerebral edema develops in a small subset of patients with hemispheric strokes, precipitating deterioration and death if decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is not performed in a timely manner. Predicting which stroke patients will develop malignant edema is imprecise based on clinical data alone. Head computed tomography (CT) imaging is often performed at baseline and 24-h. We determined the incremental value of incorporating imaging-derived features from serial CTs to enhance prediction of malignant edema.
methodsWe identified hemispheric stroke patients at three sites with NIHSS ≥ 7 who had baseline as well as 24-h clinical and CT imaging data. We extracted quantitative imaging features from baseline and follow-up CTs, including CSF volume, intracranial reserve (CSF/cranial volume), as well as midline shift (MLS) and infarct-related hypodensity volume. Potentially lethal malignant edema was defined as requiring DHC or dying with MLS over 5-mm. We built machine-learning models using logistic regression first with baseline data and then adding 24-h data including reduction in CSF volume (ΔCSF). Model performance was evaluated with cross-validation using metrics of recall (sensitivity), precision (predictive value), as well as area under receiver-operating-characteristic and precision-recall curves (AUROC, AUPRC).
resultsTwenty of 361 patients (6%) died or underwent DHC. Baseline clinical variables alone had recall of 60% with low precision (7%), AUROC 0.59, AUPRC 0.15. Adding baseline intracranial reserve improved recall to 80% and AUROC to 0.82 but precision remained only 16% (AUPRC 0.28). Incorporating ΔCSF improved AUPRC to 0.53 (AUROC 0.91) while all imaging features further improved prediction (recall 90%, precision 38%, AUROC 0.96, AUPRC 0.66).
conclusionIncorporating quantitative CT-based imaging features from baseline and 24-h CT enhances identification of patients with malignant edema needing DHC. Further refinements and external validation of such imaging-based machine-learning models are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.