Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32729056›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Response orientation modulates pitch-space relationships: the ROMPR effect.

Sarah F Klapman, Jordan T Munn, Jonathan M P Wilbiks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah F KlapmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Jordan T MunnDepartment of Psychology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, Canada.
Jonathan M P WilbiksDepartment of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, P.O. Box 5050, Saint John, NB, E2L 4L5, Canada. jwilbiks@unb.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-5215
Mount Allison University · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congruency between auditory and visuospatial stimuli has been previously shown to affect responses to multisensory stimulus pairs, and congruency between stimuli and response devices may play a role in response speed and accuracy. Across two experiments, we tested whether the accuracy and speed of pitch judgments were affected by a congruent or incongruent paired visual stimulus, and whether the relationship was modulated by response orientation. In Experiment 1, participants using a vertically (transversely) oriented keyboard demonstrated a large crossmodal vertical effect, but a minimal crossmodal horizontal effect. In contrast, Experiment 2 used a horizontally oriented keyboard, while also examining whether musical training impacts pitch judgments. As in the first experiment, we found an effect of response mapping on pitch judgments; these results suggest that vertical visual stimuli are processed automatically, while the effects of horizontal visual stimuli are decisional and require a compatible response orientation. Based on these findings, we propose an effect we call the ROMPR effect: response orientation modulates pitch-space relationships. Unexpectedly, non-musicians demonstrated significant ROMPR effects while trained musicians did not. We suggest that non-musicians are more likely to use visual information when making spatial location judgments of pitch: unlike musicians, they have not been trained to rely exclusively on auditory information during pitch processing. We also discuss alternative explanations of the data: namely, that there is a need to disambiguate audiovisual congruency from visual-response congruency with modulations of experimental design.

Indexed as

MusicPitch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationHumansJudgmentPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID32729056
OpenAlexW3045611506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.