Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728991›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2021

The Availability of Peer Support and Disparities in Outpatient Mental Health Service Use Among Minority Youth with Serious Mental Illness.

Victoria D Ojeda, Michelle R Munson, Nev Jones, Emily Berliant, Todd P Gilmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria D OjedaDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Michelle R MunsonSilver School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Nev JonesDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Emily BerliantDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Todd P GilmerDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, USA. tgilmer@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8360-3522
University of California San Diego · USNew York University · USUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Impact of peer Support on Health Services and Social Disparities Among Minority Youth with SMIR01MD011528 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OJEDA, VICTORIA D · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011528NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD011528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine whether the availability of peer support reduces disparities in service use among minority youth ages 16-24 with serious mental illness in Los Angeles and San Diego Counties. Administrative data from 2015-2018 was used to summarize service use among 13,363 transition age youth age 16-24 with serious mental illness who received services from 183 outpatient public mental health programs; 17.2% were Black, 67.4% were Latinx, and 15.4% were non-Latinx white. The availability of peer support was assessed via a program survey. Generalized linear models were used to assess the relationship between availability of peer support, defined as having a peer specialist on staff, and the annual number of outpatient mental health visits. We also examined the relationship between racial/ethnic concordance of youth and peer specialists and use of outpatient services. Forty-six percent of youth received services from programs that employed peer specialists. Among youth in both counties, the availability of peer support was associated with an increase in annual outpatient visits (P ≤ .05 each). Peer support was associated with reductions in service use disparities among Black and Latinx youth in Los Angeles County (P < .001 each). Peer concordance was associated with an increase in outpatient service use among Latinx youth in both counties (P < .05 each). Peer support was associated with increases in use of outpatient mental health services. Detailed examination of the context for youth peer support implementation is merited to identify the specific pathways that improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareHumansMinority GroupsOutpatientsYoung AdultDisparitiesMental health service useMinority youth

Identifiers

PMID32728991
PMCPMC7870605
OpenAlexW3046071514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.