ArticleJournal of anesthesia2020
Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aerosol Box Use in Reducing Health Care Worker Contamination During Airway Procedures (AIRWAY Study): A Simulation-Based Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Article
- Comparison of UESCOPE VL 400, I-View, Non-Channeled Airtraq Videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Comparison of Miller Straight Blade and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Learning Curve of Endotracheal Intubation with Videolaryngoscopes: McGrathMAC, UESCOPE, and Airtraq by Young Anesthesiology Residents - Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Crossover Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Possibility of Using the Laryngoscopes Macintosh, McCoy, Miller, Intubrite, VieScope and I-View for Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions by People without Clinical Experience: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of aerosol box use for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation in patients with COVID-19: A short-term randomised study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King VisionRomanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care · 2021Article
- Impact of aerosol box on anxiety of the anaesthesiologist for intubation during COVID-19 pandemic: A single-blinded observational study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
- Macintosh laryngoscope and i-view™ and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: a randomized crossover manikin study.JA clinical reports · 2021Article
- Aerosol containment device for airway management of patients with COVID-19: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia · 2021Review
- Intubation outcomes using the aerosol box during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective, observational study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
- Will Protective Innovations Like the "Airway Box" Become Routine Practice After the Pandemic?: An Opinion Survey.Cureus · 2021Article
- Effect of two barrier devices on the time taken and ease of intubation of a paediatric intubation manikin - A randomised cross-over simulation study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- Performance of Aerosol Boxes for Endotracheal Intubation during the COVID-19 Pandemic with Systematic Review.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
- Comparison of aerosol box intubation with styletted endotracheal tube and intubation over bougie: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty. Eighteen experienced anesthetists intubated the trachea of a manikin with a normal airway 6 times using a direct laryngoscope, a McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope, or an airway scope AWS-S200NK videolaryngoscope with or without an aerosol box. Although the aerosol box prolonged the time to successful intubation and decreased the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score when using a direct laryngoscope, the statistically significant differences were clinically irrelevant. When a McGRATH™ MAC and an AWS-S200NK were used, the times to successful intubation and POGO scores were comparable with and without the aerosol box. When using any of the laryngoscopes, there were no statistically significant differences in the Cormack-Lehane grade and peak force to maxillary incisors with and without the aerosol box. In summary, the effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty is not clinically relevant when an experienced anesthetist intubates the trachea in a normal airway condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.