Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728935›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Remote screening of retinal and optic disc diseases using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in programmed routine occupational health checkups onsite at work centers.

Miguel A Zapata, Ruth Martín, Claudia Garcia-Arumí, Alex Fonollosa, Ignacio Flores-Moreno, Roberto Gallego-Pinazo, Estanislao Gutiérrez, Maximino Abraldes, Javier Zarranz-Ventura, On behalf Optretina Reading Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence-based diagnostic system for holistic maculopathy screening in a routine occupational health checkup context.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel A ZapataOptretina, C/ Las Palmas 11, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. mazapata@optretina.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0096-4569
Ruth MartínHospital Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Claudia Garcia-ArumíHospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alex FonollosaOptretina Image Reading Team, Barcelona, Spain.
Ignacio Flores-MorenoOptretina Image Reading Team, Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto Gallego-PinazoOptretina Image Reading Team, Barcelona, Spain.
Estanislao GutiérrezOptretina Image Reading Team, Barcelona, Spain.
Maximino AbraldesOptretina Image Reading Team, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier Zarranz-VenturaHospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
On behalf Optretina Reading Group
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESImagina (Spain) · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the first year outcomes of a remote screening program for detection of retinal diseases using handheld nonmydriatic cameras in occupational routine checkups performed onsite at work centers.

methodsCross-sectional, first year screening program outcomes audit. Participants were volunteers recruited from staff within work centers. Retinal fundus images were captured by technicians, and images and data were anonymized and sent securely to a remote server. A team of ophthalmologists, all retinal specialists, remotely read the images using a custom-made software and sent telematic reports of findings within 24-48 h. The main items evaluated were the detection of retinal abnormalities and the relationship between retinal findings and demographic data such as age and sex.

resultsA total of 19,881 workers were evaluated in 52 centers. Mean age was 41.1 years old, 43.9% men and 56.1% women. Mean duration of the test was around 2 min. Of the workers, 7.8% presented abnormalities in retinal fundus images, being the main findings choroidal nevus (2.4%), macular pigment abnormalities (1.5%), glaucomatous optic disc (1.2%), and macular signs of high myopia (1.1%). The presence of abnormalities was associated with greater age, being 5%, 7.9%, 12.6%, and 19.7% in workers less than 40 years, from 40 to 49, 50-59, and ≥ 60 years (p < 0.05), respectively. Men had more abnormalities in retinal fundus images than women (8.6 vs. 7.2; p < 0.05 RR: 1.2; CI 1092-1322).

conclusionsMass screening of retinal and optic disc abnormalities during occupational health routine checkups is a feasible, quick, and efficient tool for early detection of potential vision-threatening disease markers.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthOptic DiskRetinal DiseasesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningPhotographyOccupational healthOptic nerve diseasesRetinal diseasesScreeningTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32728935
PMCPMC7391026
OpenAlexW3045712313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.