ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
Routine knee MRI: how common are peripheral nerve abnormalities, and why does it matter?
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESR essentials: MRI of the knee-practice recommendations by ESSR.European radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the frequency, MRI appearance, and clinical significance of peripheral nerve abnormalities encountered on routine knee MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review was performed to identify consecutive patients who underwent routine knee MRI from March 2015-2018 and had peripheral nerve abnormalities. MRIs were reviewed for the presence of tibial (TN) and common peroneal nerve (CPN) abnormalities (including hyperintensity, bulbous enlargement, discontinuity, architectural distortion, skeletal muscle denervation). The presence or absence of concomitant meniscal, cruciate, and collateral ligament tears was documented. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were reported.
resultsThe search yielded 8125 MRIs, of which 50 knee MRIs (patient age (years): 44 + 19) had peripheral nerve abnormalities (hyperintensity (TN: 30%(15/50), CPN: 80%(40/50)), bulbous enlargement (TN: 10%(5/50), CPN: 30%(15/50)), discontinuity (TN: 0, CPN: 4%(2/50)), architectural distortion (TN: 4%(2/50), CPN: 18%(9/50)), and skeletal muscle denervation (TN: 14%(7/50), CPN: 28%(14/50)). Medial meniscus (TN: 12% (6/50), CPN: 36%(18/50)), ACL (TN: 4%(2/50), CPN: 32%(16/50)), PCL (TN: 2%(1/50), CPN: 20%(10/50)), and lateral meniscus (TN: 12%(6/50), CPN: 24%(12/50)) tears were frequently present. Of these, 32% (16/50) were treated for peripheral nerve injury (PNI), characterized as high-grade (n = 7/16) or low-grade (n = 9/16). Nerve discontinuity, architectural distortion, and denervation were encountered more in high-grade PNI than low-grade PNI. Five patients were recalled for follow-up imaging and operative management was performed in 36% of cases (18/50).
conclusionAlthough uncommon (frequency = 0.6%), peripheral nerve abnormalities (CPN more common than TN) are encountered on routine knee MRI and affect patient management, with 36% requiring surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.