Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728903›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2020

Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Daniele Starnoni, Lorenzo Giammattei, Giulia Cossu, Michael J Link, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Ari G Chacko, Kenji Ohata, Majid Samii, Ashish Suri, Michael Bruneau and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and management of vestibular schwannoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 17 institutions in 11 countries.

Daniele StarnoniDepartment of Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, University hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lorenzo GiammatteiNeurosurgical Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Giulia CossuDepartment of Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, University hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michael J LinkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pierre-Hugues RocheDepartment of Neurosurgery, CHU North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Ari G ChackoDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kenji OhataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Majid SamiiNeurosurgery, International Neuroscience Institute, Hannover, Germany.
Ashish SuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Michael BruneauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Jan F CorneliusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Luigi CavalloDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Naples Federico II, Naples, NA, Italy.
Torstein R MelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sebastien FroelichNeurosurgical Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Marcos TatagibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Albert SufianovFederal Centre of Neurosurgery, Tyumen, Russian Federation; Department of Neurosurgery, The State Education Institution of Higher Professional Training, The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University under Ministry of Health, Tyumen, Russian Federation.
Dimitrios ParaskevopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Idoya ZazpeServicio de Neurocirugía, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Moncef BerhoumaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel JouanneauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France.
Jeroen B VerheulDepartment of Neurosurgery and Gamma knife Centre, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Constantin TuleascaDepartment of Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, University hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mercy GeorgeENT Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV); Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc LevivierDepartment of Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, University hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mahmoud MessererDepartment of Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, University hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roy Thomas DanielDepartment of Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, University hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. roy.daniel@chuv.ch.
University of Lausanne · CHHôpital Lariboisière · FRHôpital Pierre Wertheimer · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBarts Health NHS Trust · GBChristian Medical College · INComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus Hospital · BEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEInternational Neuroscience Institute · DEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOsaka City University · JPUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Tyumen · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe optimal management of large vestibular schwannomas continues to be debated. We constituted a task force comprising the members of the EANS skull base committee along with international experts to derive recommendations for the management of this problem from a European perspective. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review of MEDLINE database, in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines, was performed. A subgroup analysis screening all surgical series published within the last 20 years (January 2000 to March 2020) was performed. Weighted summary rates for tumor resection, oncological control, and facial nerve preservation were determined using meta-analysis models. This data along with contemporary practice patterns were discussed within the task force to generate consensual recommendations regarding preoperative evaluations, optimal surgical strategy, and follow-up management.

resultsTumor classification grades should be systematically used in the perioperative management of patients, with large vestibular schwannomas (VS) defined as > 30 mm in the largest extrameatal diameter. Grading scales for pre- and postoperative hearing (AAO-HNS or GR) and facial nerve function (HB) are to be used for reporting functional outcome. There is a lack of consensus to support the superiority of any surgical strategy with respect to extent of resection and use of adjuvant radiosurgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring needs to be routinely used to preserve neural function. Recommendations for postoperative clinico-radiological evaluations have been elucidated based on the surgical strategy employed.

conclusionThe main goal of management of large vestibular schwannomas should focus on maintaining/improving quality of life (QoL), making every attempt at facial/cochlear nerve functional preservation while ensuring optimal oncological control, thereby allowing to meet patient expectations. Despite the fact that this analysis yielded only a few Class B evidences and mostly expert opinions, it will guide practitioners to manage these patients and form the basis for future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeConsensusHearingHumansMicrosurgeryNeuroma, AcousticNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRadiosurgerySkull BaseTreatment OutcomeCombined managementGross total resectionLarge vestibular schwannomaMicrosurgeryRadiosurgerySubtotal resection

Identifiers

PMID32728903
PMCPMC7550309
OpenAlexW3046711406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.