Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728897›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

Fragility fracture discriminative ability of radius quantitative ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Y Fu, C Li, W Luo, Z Chen, Z Liu, Y Ding

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vivo Assessment of Bone Quality Without X-rays.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y FuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
C LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
W LuoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Z ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Z LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Y DingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. dingyue@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-1563
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Larboratory 1102101201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fragility fracture discriminative ability of radius quantitative ultrasound (QUS) was evaluated in a systematic review of 13 studies, including 16,681 individuals and 1296 fractures. The radial speed of sound (SOS) per standard deviation (SD) decrease contributed to an increased risk of total and hip fracture by 32% and 66% in women. Osteoporotic fracture, as a devastating consequence of osteoporosis, brings severe socio-economic burden. The availability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), as the gold standard of diagnosis, was quite limited in remote areas. Radius QUS measured by SOS shows potential in fracture discriminative ability where DXA equipment is not available. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the association between radius QUS and fracture risk. A detailed article search was carried out on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Libraries, CNKI, Wan-Fang database, VIP, and SinoMed for studies published between January 1980 and February 2020. We determined the estimated relative risk (RR) for fracture per each radial SOS SD decrease. A meta-analysis of studies was performed under the random-effects model. A total of 16,681 individuals were included in this review. Among the participants, 5892 were male and 10,789 were female. A total of 1296 cases of fragility fracture were included. With each SD decrease in radial SOS, the risk of overall fragility fracture and hip fracture was increased by 21% and 55%, respectively. Particularly, the risk was increased by 32% and 66% for women. The association was even stronger for postmenopausal women. Radius QUS showed great potential as an effective tool for fracture risk evaluation, especially for women.

Indexed as

Osteoporosis, PostmenopausalRadiusUltrasonographyAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleFragility fracturesMeta-analysisOsteoporosisQuantitative ultrasoundRadius

Identifiers

PMID32728897
PMCPMC7755656
OpenAlexW3046156669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.