ReviewWorld journal of urology2021
Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Review in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Institutional Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Novel Intracorporeal Lithotripters: ShockPulse-SEJournal of endourology · 2021Trial
- Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (S-PCNL): a propensity score matched study of surgical outcomes and complications.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Combined Intra Renal Surgery versus Percutanous Nephrolithotomy: utcomes of a matched case-control analyis.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Transient ureteral obstruction after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with stone volume and location: results from a single-center, real-life study.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Comparison of lithotripsy methods during mini-PNL: is there a role for ballistic lithotripsy in the era of high-power lasers.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of simultaneous bilateral surgery using the oblique overriding position in the treatment of bilateral kidney stones.Urolithiasis · 2023Article
- PERCUTANEOUS APPROACH TO THE KIDNEY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES OF VARIOUS TECHNIQUES - EXPERIENCE IN OSIJEK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Review
- Validation of the Trifecta Scoring Metric in Vacuum-Assisted Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Mini-track, mini-nephroscopy, mini-ultrasonic probe percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its initial clinical application.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Effect of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Combined with Needle Nephrolithotomy on Renal Function and Complication Rate in Patients with Complex Renal Calculi.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Evaluation of intrarenal pressure stability at different lithotripter suction settings in a porcine kidney model.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Consultation of kidney stones: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Comparison of antegrade and retrograde ureterolithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
methodsA scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled "Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy" held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019.
resultsNew-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS).
conclusionRecent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.