Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728833›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2020

Ultra-Rapid Lispro Efficacy and Safety Compared to Humalog® in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: PRONTO-T2D Subpopulation Analysis.

Hideaki Jinnouchi, Makoto Imori, Hiroshi Nishiyama, Takeshi Imaoka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT03214380. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03214380 phase3completed

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of LY900014 to Insulin Lispro, Both in Combination With Insulin Glargine or Insulin Degludec in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes PRONTO-T2D

Ran2017Enrolled933Registered outcomes11Posted comparisons3ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsinsulin degludec, Insulin glargine, insulin lispro, LY900014, Metformin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hideaki JinnouchiJinnouchi Hospital, 6 Chome-2-3 Kuhonji, Chuo Ward, Kumamoto, 862-0976, Japan.
Makoto ImoriMedicines Development Unit Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, 5-1-28, Isogami-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan. imori_makoto@lilly.com.
Hiroshi NishiyamaMedicines Development Unit Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, 5-1-28, Isogami-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan.
Takeshi ImaokaMedicines Development Unit Japan and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, 5-1-28, Isogami-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 651-0086, Japan.
Eli Lilly (Japan) · JPNoguchi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultra-rapid lispro (URLi) versus lispro in a subgroup analysis of Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from the phase 3 PRONTO-T2D trial.

methodsAfter an 8-week lead-in period during which patients transitioned to insulin lispro 3 times a day before main meals in association with basal insulin (glargine or degludec), the patients were randomized to 26 weeks of double-blind URLi or lispro injected immediately prior to meals. The primary endpoint was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 26 between URLi and lispro. The multiplicity-adjusted objectives were 1- and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions after a test meal and change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 in the URLi and lispro groups.

resultsResults were obtained from prespecified exploratory analyses of 26-week data in Japanese patients randomized to receive URLi (n = 47) or lispro (n = 46). Mean baseline HbA1c levels significantly improved during the lead-in period to a baseline value of 7.50% and 7.60% in patients subsequently randomized to the URLi and lispro treatment groups, respectively. At week 26, the least squares mean (LSM) difference in HbAc1 between the URLi and lispro groups was 0.13% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.12 to 0.39) (1.4 mmol/mol, 95% CI - 1.3 to 4.2). Although there were no significant differences in PPG excursions at any time-point, numerically smaller PPG excursions were consistently observed from 30 min to 3 h during the mixed-meal tolerance test in patients on URLi compared to those on lispro. LSM differences in PPG excursions at week 26 were - 10.5 mg/dL (95% CI - 32.7 to 11.7) (- 0.58 mmol/L, 95% CI - 1.82 to 0.65) at 1 h and - 14.9 mg/dL (95% CI - 40.3 to 10.5) (- 0.83 mmol/L, 95% CI - 2.24 to 0.58) at 2 h. There were no significant differences between treatments in rates of severe/overall hypoglycemia or incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.

conclusionsURLi administered as prandial insulin in combination with basal insulin provides effective glycemic control when administered immediately before a meal in Japanese patients with T2DM. URLi was well tolerated in this population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03214380.

Indexed as

Hemoglobin A1cHumalogJapanMixed-meal tolerance testPostprandial hyperglycemiaType 2 diabetes mellitusUltra-rapid lispro

Identifiers

PMID32728833
PMCPMC7434814
OpenAlexW3045982860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.