Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728823›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Surgical Duct-to-Duct Reconstruction: an Alternative Approach to Late Biliary Anastomotic Stricture After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

Jens Mittler, Kenneth D Chavin, Stefan Heinrich, Roman Kloeckner, Tim Zimmermann, Hauke Lang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens MittlerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. jens.mittler@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-6036
Kenneth D ChavinUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-5047, USA.
Stefan HeinrichDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Roman KloecknerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Tim ZimmermannFirst Medical Department, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Hauke LangDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBilio-enteric diversion is the current surgical standard in patients after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) with a biliary anastomotic stricture failing interventional treatment and requiring surgical repair. In contrast to this routine, the aim of this study was to show the feasibility and safety of a duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. PATIENTS: Between 2012 and 2019, we performed a total of 308 DDLT in 292 adult patients. The overall biliary complication rate was 20.5%. Patients with non-anastomotic or combined strictures were excluded from this analysis. Out of 273 patients after a primary duct-to-duct reconstruction, 20 (7.3%) developed late isolated AS. Seven of these patients failed interventional biliary treatment and required a surgical repair.

resultsDuct-to-duct reconstruction was feasible and successful in all patients. Liver function tests fully normalized and no patient required any form of biliary intervention after surgery. One patient with intraoperative cholangiosepsis was ICU bound for 5 days, and another patient with a subhepatic abscess required percutaneous drainage. There was no perioperative death. The median length of hospital stay was 8 (5-17) days. The median time of follow-up after relaparotomy was 1593 (434-2495) days.

conclusionDuct-to-duct reconstruction is a feasible and safe option in selected patients requiring surgical repair for isolated AS after DDLT. This approach preserves the biliary anatomy and avoids the potential side effects of a bilio-enteric diversion.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract Surgical ProceduresLiver TransplantationAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalBile DuctsConstriction, PathologicHumansLiving DonorsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiliary complicationBiliary reconstructionBilio-enteric diversionHepatico-jejunostomySurgical bile duct repair

Identifiers

PMID32728823
PMCPMC7940287
OpenAlexW3045885917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.