Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728808›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2021

Deciphering the complexity of simple chromosomal insertions by genome sequencing.

Zirui Dong, Matthew Hoi Kin Chau, Yanyan Zhang, Peng Dai, Xiaofan Zhu, Tak Yeung Leung, Xiangdong Kong, Yvonne K Kwok, Paweł Stankiewicz, Sau Wai Cheung and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. X-linked variations inJournal of medical genetics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zirui Dong *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-6500
Matthew Hoi Kin Chau *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-1938
Yanyan Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Peng DaiGenetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Xiaofan ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tak Yeung LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-0343
Xiangdong KongGenetics and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Yvonne K KwokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Paweł StankiewiczDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sau Wai CheungBaylor College of Medicine Joint Center For Medical Genetics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. scheung@bcm.edu.
Kwong Wai ChoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. richardchoy@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-6200
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Direct Grant 2019.051Health and Medical Research Fund 04152666Health and Medical Research Fund 07180576National Natural Science Foundation of China 31801042National Natural Science Foundation of China 81741004National Natural Science Foundation of China 81741009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal insertions are thought to be rare structural rearrangements. The current understanding of the underlying mechanisms of their origin is still limited. In this study, we sequenced 16 cases with apparent simple insertions previously identified by karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis. Using mate-pair genome sequencing (GS), we identified all 16 insertions and revised previously designated karyotypes in 75.0% (12/16) of the cases. Additional cryptic rearrangements were identified in 68.8% of the cases (11/16). The incidence of additional cryptic rearrangements in chromosomal insertions was significantly higher compared to balanced translocations and inversions reported in other studies by GS. We characterized and classified the cryptic insertion rearrangements into four groups, which were not mutually exclusive: (1) insertion segments were fragmented and their subsegments rearranged and clustered at the insertion site (10/16, 62.5%); (2) one or more cryptic subsegments were not inserted into the insertion site (5/16, 31.3%); (3) segments of the acceptor chromosome were scattered and rejoined with the insertion segments (2/16, 12.5%); and (4) copy number gains were identified in the flanking regions of the insertion site (2/16, 12.5%). In addition to the observation of these chromothripsis- or chromoanasynthesis-like events, breakpoint sequence analysis revealed microhomology to be the predominant feature. However, no significant correlation was found between the number of cryptic rearrangements and the size of the insertion. Overall, our study provide molecular characterization of karyotypically apparent simple insertions, demonstrate previously underappreciated complexities, and evidence that chromosomal insertions are likely formed by nonhomologous end joining and/or microhomology-mediated replication-based DNA repair.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionChromosome MappingChromosomes, HumanDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA End-Joining RepairGene RearrangementGenome, HumanHumansKaryotypingMicroarray AnalysisMutagenesis, InsertionalSequence Analysis, DNATranslocation, GeneticWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32728808
OpenAlexW3045506924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.