Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728777›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2021

Virtual monochromatic dual-energy CT reconstructions improve detection of cerebral infarct in patients with suspicion of stroke.

Fasco van Ommen, Jan Willem Dankbaar, Guangming Zhu, Dylan N Wolman, Jeremy J Heit, Frans Kauw, Edwin Bennink, Hugo W A M de Jong, Max Wintermark

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fasco van OmmenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA. F.vanOmmen@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-9873
Jan Willem DankbaarDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Guangming ZhuDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Dylan N WolmanDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeremy J HeitDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Frans KauwDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Edwin BenninkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Hugo W A M de JongDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, E01.132, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Max WintermarkDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stanford Medicine · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Hartstichting (NL) 14732Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen 14732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly infarcts are hard to diagnose on non-contrast head CT. Dual-energy CT (DECT) may potentially increase infarct differentiation. The optimal DECT settings for differentiation were identified and evaluated.

methodsOne hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients who presented with suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and underwent non-contrast DECT and subsequent DWI were retrospectively identified. The DWI was used as reference standard. First, virtual monochromatic images (VMI) of 25 patients were reconstructed from 40 to 140 keV and scored by two readers for acute infarct. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for infarct detection were compared and a subset of VMI energies were selected. Next, for a separate larger cohort of 100 suspected AIS patients, conventional non-contrast CT (NCT) and selected VMI were scored by two readers for the presence and location of infarct. The same statistics for infarct detection were calculated. Infarct location match was compared per vascular territory. Subgroup analyses were dichotomized by time from last-seen-well to CT imaging.

resultsA total of 80-90 keV VMI were marginally more sensitive (36.3-37.3%) than NCT (32.4%; p > 0.680), with marginally higher specificity (92.2-94.4 vs 91.1%; p > 0.509) for infarct detection. Location match was superior for VMI compared with NCT (28.7-27.4 vs 19.5%; p < 0.010). Within 4.5 h from last-seen-well, 80 keV VMI more accurately detected infarct (58.0 vs 54.0%) and localized infarcts (27.1 vs 11.9%; p = 0.004) than NCT, whereas after 4.5 h, 90 keV VMI was more accurate (69.3 vs 66.3%).

conclusionNon-contrast 80-90 keV VMI best differentiates normal from infarcted brain parenchyma.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionStrokeCerebral InfarctionHumansRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedDual-energy CTNon-contrast CTStrokeVirtual monochromatic images

Identifiers

PMID32728777
PMCPMC7803871
OpenAlexW3046021490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.