[Does sealing the oval window in addition to the round window bring an advantage in reserve therapy of acute idiopathic deafness?]

backgroundFollowing sudden unilateral deafness or severe sensorineural hearing loss, patients with unsuccessful intravenous steroid therapy can be treated with explorative tympanotomy with sealing of the round (RW) and/or oval window (OW), due to suspected rupture of the RW with perilymph fistula (PLF) or a fissula ante fenestram (FAF). This study investigated whether additional sealing of the oval window (RW+OW) achieved an improved hearing benefit as compared to sealing of the round window only (RW) .

methodsThis retrospective study investigated 54 patients with acute profound hearing loss who underwent tympanoscopy. Audiometric examinations were performed preoperatively and at two postoperative intervals (1 month and 3-6 months after surgery). In 28 patients, the OW was sealed in addition to the RW.

resultsNo intraoperatively visible PLF or FAF were reported. Hearing thresholds were significantly reduced in the early postoperative follow-up period and further improvement was observed 3-6 months later. No significant differences between the RW and RW+OW subgroups were seen at either follow-up timepoint. In 65% (Kanzaki criteria) and 74% (Siegel criteria) of patients, partial or complete postoperative hearing improvement was observed. Upon comparing the groups of patients with and without hearing improvement, no statistical significance was found in terms of gender, age, secondary diagnoses, or latency period between symptom onset and surgery.

conclusionAdditional sealing of the OW did not lead to significantly better postoperative hearing thresholds. In general, postoperative hearing improvement corresponds to published spontaneous remission rates.