Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728711›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2021

Textbook outcome as a composite outcome measure in non-small-cell lung cancer surgery.

Martijn G Ten Berge, Naomi Beck, Willem Hans Steup, Ad F T M Verhagen, Thomas J van Brakel, Wilhelmina H Schreurs, Michel W J M Wouters, Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Textbook Outcome After Oral Cancer Surgery as a Composite Measure for Survival and Quality-of-Care Evaluation.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martijn G Ten BergeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Naomi BeckDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Willem Hans SteupDepartment of Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, Den Haag, Netherlands.
Ad F T M VerhagenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Thomas J van BrakelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Wilhelmina H SchreursDepartment of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, Netherlands.
Michel W J M WoutersDutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, Netherlands.
Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesQuality assessment is an important element in providing surgical cancer care. The main objective of this study was to develop a new composite measure 'textbook outcome', to evaluate and improve quality of surgical care for patients undergoing a resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsAll patients undergoing an anatomical resection for NSCLC from 2012 to 2016 registered in the nationwide Dutch Lung Cancer Audit were included in an analysis to assess usefulness of a composite measure as a quality indicator. Based on expert opinion, textbook outcome was defined as having a complete resection (negative resection margins and sufficient lymph node dissection), plus no 30-day or in-hospital mortality, no reintervention in 30 days, no readmission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged hospital stay (<14 days), no hospital readmission after discharge and no major complications. The percentage of patients with a textbook outcome was calculated per hospital. Between-hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed using case-mix adjustment models.

resultsIn total, 5513 patients were included in this study. Textbook outcome was achieved in 26.4% of patients. Insufficient lymph node dissection had the most substantial effect on not realizing textbook outcome. If 'sufficient lymph node dissection' was not included as a criterion, textbook outcome would be 60.7%. Case-mix adjusted textbook outcome proportions per hospitals varied between 13.2% and 37.7%.

conclusionsIn contrast to focusing on a single aspect, the composite measure textbook outcome provides insight into comprehensive performance in NSCLC surgery. It can be used to evaluate both individual hospitals and national performance and provides the opportunity to give benchmarked feedback to thoracic surgeons.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHospitalsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk AdjustmentClinical auditingNon-small-cell lung cancerPostoperative outcomeSurgeryTextbook outcome

Identifiers

PMID32728711
PMCPMC7781522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.