Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728703›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2020

Surveillance of HIV-1 transmitted integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance in the UK.

Jean L Mbisa, Juan Ledesma, Peter Kirwan, David F Bibby, Carmen Manso, Andrew Skingsley, Gary Murphy, Alison Brown, David T Dunn, Valerie Delpech and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jean L MbisaNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Juan LedesmaNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Peter KirwanNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
David F BibbyNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Carmen MansoNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Andrew SkingsleyNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Gary MurphyNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Alison BrownNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
David T DunnInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Valerie DelpechNational Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Anna Maria GerettiInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Public Health England · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV treatment guidelines have traditionally recommended that all HIV-positive individuals are tested for evidence of drug resistance prior to starting ART. Testing for resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and PIs is well established in routine care. However, testing for integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) resistance is less consistent.

objectivesTo inform treatment guidelines by determining the prevalence of InSTI resistance in a national cohort of recently infected individuals. PATIENTS AND

methodsRecent (within 4 months) HIV-1 infections were identified using a Recent Infection Testing Algorithm of new HIV-1 diagnoses in the UK. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in integrase, protease and reverse transcriptase were detected by ultradeep sequencing, which allows for the sensitive estimation of the frequency of each resistant variant in a sample.

resultsThe analysis included 655 randomly selected individuals (median age = 33 years, 95% male, 83% MSM, 78% white) sampled in the period 2014 to 2016 and determined to have a recent infection. These comprised 320, 138 and 197 samples from 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. None of the samples had major InSTI RAMs occurring at high variant frequency (≥20%). A subset (25/640, 3.9%) had major InSTI RAMs occurring only as low-frequency variants (2%-20%). In contrast, 47/588 (8.0%) had major reverse transcriptase inhibitor and PI RAMs at high frequency.

conclusionsBetween 2014 and 2016, major InSTI RAMs were uncommon in adults with recent HIV-1 infection, only occurring as low-frequency variants of doubtful clinical significance. Continued surveillance of newly diagnosed patients for evidence of transmitted InSTI resistance is recommended to inform clinical practice.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV IntegraseHIV Integrase InhibitorsSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultDrug Resistance, ViralFemaleGenotypeHomosexuality, MaleHumansIntegrasesMaleMutationUnited KingdomHIV IntegraseHIV Integrase InhibitorsIntegrases

Identifiers

PMID32728703
PMCPMC7566560
OpenAlexW3047428576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.