ArticleJournal of academic ophthalmology (2017)2020
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Small-Group Training in Teaching Medical Students Integral Clinical Eye Examination Skills.
Article in Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparison of conventional and wide field direct ophthalmoscopy on medical students' self-confidence for fundus examination: a 1-year follow-up.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Characterization of the retinal vasculature in fundus photos using the PanOptic iExaminer system.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2020Article
- The Decline of Basic Ophthalmology in General Medical Education: A Scoping Review and Recommended Potential Solutions.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive, small-group ophthalmology clinical training session by assessing medical students' self-confidence with eye examination skills and long-term retention of direct ophthalmoscopy skills.
methodsThe second-year medical students participated in a one-time small-group clinical training session that taught essential components of the eye examination. Students reported their confidence with each component in pre- and postsession surveys. Eight months later, direct ophthalmoscopy skills were reassessed by having students visualize the optic nerves of standardized patients and identify the matching optic nerve photograph in a multiple-choice quiz.
resultsAmong 197 second-year medical students who participated in the training session, 172 students completed the presession survey (87.3% response rate) and 108 students completed the postsession survey (54.8% response rate). Following the training session, students reported increased self-confidence (
conclusionOur comprehensive, one-time eye examination skills training session seeks to prepare students to incorporate these skills in future patient care. Students' overall confidence improved in each aspect of the eye examination that was covered. A follow-up assessment on students' direct ophthalmoscopy skills suggests that the PanOptic ophthalmoscope allows for superior skills retention as compared with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope. We believe that the PanOptic ophthalmoscope should be further integrated into medical education and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.