Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728400›Full record

ArticleJournal of mobile technology in medicine2019

Teleophthalmology through handheld mobile devices: a pilot study in rural Nepal.

Karen Hong, Sean Collon, David Chang, Sunil Thakalli, John Welling, Matthew Oliva, Esteban Peralta, Reeta Gurung, Sanduk Ruit, Geoffrey Tabin and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mobile technology in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen HongByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Sean CollonVanderbilt University School of Medicine.
David ChangLos Altos Eye Physicians, Los Alto, CA.
Sunil ThakalliHimalayan Cataract Project.
John WellingHimalayan Cataract Project.
Matthew OlivaHimalayan Cataract Project.
Esteban PeraltaUniversity of Florida School of Medicine.
Reeta GurungTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sanduk RuitTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Geoffrey TabinByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.
David MyungByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Suman ThapaTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Stanford University · USTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology · NPUniversity of Florida · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare screening referral recommendations made by remotely located ophthalmic technicians with those of an ophthalmologist examining digital photos obtained by a portable ophthalmic camera system powered by an iOS handheld mobile device (iPod Touch).

methodsDilated screening eye exams were performed by ophthalmic technicians in four remote districts of Nepal. Anterior and posterior segment photographs captured with a Paxos Scope ophthalmic camera system attached to an iPod Touch 6

resultsUsing the transmitted images, the ophthalmologist recommended referral for an additional 20% of the 346 total subjects screened who would not have been referred by the ophthalmic technician. Of those subjects, 34% were referred to the retina clinic. Conversely, among the 101 patients referred by the technician, the ophthalmologist concurred with the appropriateness of referral in more than 97% of cases but thought eight (2.8%) of those patients had variants of normal eye pathology.

conclusionAn ophthalmologist who reviewed data and photos gathered with the mobile device teleophthalmology system identified a significant number of patients whose need for referral was not identified by the screening technician. Posterior segment pathology was most frequently found by the remote reader and not by the technician performing dilated slit lamp examinations. These results are promising for further clinical implementation of handheld mobile devices as tools for teleophthalmic screening in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

global healthophthalmologyreferral and consultationrural populationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32728400
PMCPMC7388679
OpenAlexW2957367464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.