Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728391›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology

Chyluria: what does the clinician need to know?

Victoria Stainer, Patrick Jones, Siri Øvereng Juliebø, Rupert Beck, Amr Hawary

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Refractory chyluria warranting surgical managementa case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chyluria: non-enhanced MR lymphography.Insights into imaging · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria StainerDepartment of Urology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK.
Patrick JonesDepartment of Urology, Great Western Hospital, Tremona Rd, Southampton, Swindon SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1283
Siri Øvereng JuliebøDepartment of Gynaecology, Sykehuset Telemark, Skien, Norway.
Rupert BeckDepartment of Urology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK.
Amr HawaryDepartment of Urology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK.
Great Western Hospital · GBTelemark Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chyluria is secondary to the presence of chyle in the urine. The classical appearance on inspection is of milky white urine, which is caused by a fistulous communication between the lymphatic system and the urinary tract. Worldwide, it is most commonly associated with the parasite

Indexed as

chyluriainfectionkidneylymphangiographysclerotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32728391
PMCPMC7366404
OpenAlexW3042950780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.