Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728265›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of creative behavior2020

Validation of the Italian Remote Associate Test.

Carola Salvi, Giulio Costantini, Adriana Pace, Massimiliano Palmiero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of creative behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Not Getting Vaccinated? It Is a Matter of Problem-Solving Abilities and Socio-Cognitive Polarization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Enhancement of semantic integration reasoning by tRNS.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carola SalviDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Brain Mapping Group, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Giulio CostantiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Adriana PaceDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Massimiliano PalmieroDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Italy.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE NEUROSCIENCE OF HUMAN COGNITIONT32NS047987 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Rodrigo M Braga, Christina Maria Zelano · 2006 to 2026
$5.6M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS047987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific approach to the study of creative problem solving has shifted from using classic insight problems (e.g., the

Indexed as

AnagramsConvergent ThinkingCreativityDivergent ThinkingProblem SolvingRemotes Associates Task

Identifiers

PMID32728265
PMCPMC7388808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.