Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728224›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Updated staging and patient outcomes in low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.

Samuel J Ballentine, Jacquelyn Carr, Eliahu Y Bekhor, Umut Sarpel, Alexandros D Polydorides

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a case series.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acellular Appendix Vermiform Mucinous Neoplasm.Case reports in pathology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. [Incidental finding of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Uncommon causes of acute appendicitis: Retrospective analysis of 6785 histopathological findings in a tertiary center.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel J BallentineDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jacquelyn CarrDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Eliahu Y BekhorDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Umut SarpelDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandros D PolydoridesDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. alexandros.polydorides@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-0756
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) exhibit drastically different clinical course and prognosis depending on tumor stage, particularly as it relates to the extent and cellularity of peritoneal involvement. In this context, recent changes in staging guidelines have sought to clarify criteria for pT and pM categories. This study's aim was to identify clinicopathological features associated with patient outcomes, especially as they pertain to updated stage groups. We reviewed LAMNs from 192 patients (mean age: 56.9 years, 119 (62.0%) women). The tumors consisted of 66 (34.4%) pTisM0, 16 (8.3%) pT3M0, 16 (8.3%) pT4aM0, 27 (14.1%) pTxM1a, and 67 (34.9%) pTxM1b cases. In multivariate analysis, only gross perforation was significantly associated with higher TNM group stage (p = 0.001; OR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.7-6.4). Of 165 (85.9%) patients with clinical follow-up, 51 (30.9%) had disease progression (over a mean 33.7 months, range: 4.7-121.7), whereas over significantly longer follow-up (mean 48.7 months, range: 3.1-143.9; p = 0.004), 114 (69.1%) patients did not. In multivariate analysis, higher TNM stage was significantly associated with disease progression (p = 0.029; OR 18.3, 95% CI: 1.4-246.0). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, none of 74 patients with disease limited to the appendix (pM0), 6 of 27 (22.2%) cases with peritoneal involvement by acellular mucin only (pM1a), and 45 of 64 (70.3%) tumors with intraperitoneal deposits containing neoplastic cells (pM1b) showed disease progression (p < 0.001). These differences in progression-free survival among TNM groups persisted when limiting the analysis to patients who had undergone successful cytoreductive surgery (p = 0.050). Finally, in four patients (all with pM1b disease) death was attributed to disease progression whereas there was no disease-specific mortality in the pM0 and pM1a groups (p = 0.020). These data support the designation of LAMNs with acellular peritoneal mucin as having an intermediate prognosis between cases limited to the appendix and those with intraperitoneal deposits containing neoplastic epithelium.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedAppendiceal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32728224
OpenAlexW3045645944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.