Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32728223›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Prognostic impact of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma within distinct molecular subgroups.

Tilman T Rau, Eva Bettschen, Carol Büchi, Lucine Christe, Amanda Rohner, Michael D Müller, Joseph W Carlson, Sara Imboden, Inti Zlobec

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uterine carcinosarcoma vs endometrial serous and clear cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion according to the molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tilman T RauInstitute of Pathology, University Bern Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland. Tilman.Rau@pathology.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-950X
Eva BettschenInstitute of Pathology, University Bern Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Carol BüchiInstitute of Pathology, University Bern Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Lucine ChristeInstitute of Pathology, University Bern Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Amanda RohnerInstitute of Pathology, University Bern Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael D MüllerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Joseph W CarlsonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-4107
Sara Imboden *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Inti Zlobec *Institute of Pathology, University Bern Murtenstrasse 31, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor budding is a robust prognostic parameter in several tumor entities but is rarely investigated in endometrial carcinoma. We applied the recently standardized counting method from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference for colorectal cancer (ITBCC) on a cohort of 255 endometrial carcinomas with known molecular profiles according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subgroups. Our investigation aims to clarify the potential prognostic role of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma in contrast to other known prognostic factors, including molecular factors. In addition, the microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern and tumor budding were compared with respect to their potential as markers for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Tumor budding was found in n = 67 (26.3%) tumors, with a very low mean of 0.7 buds per ×20 HE field. Tumor budding was significantly associated with depth of invasion, nodal status, lymphatic invasion (each p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.004), and vascular invasion (p = 0.01). Tumor budding showed moderate inter-observer-variability with prognostic stratification irrespective of the observer (κ-value = 0.448). In multivariate analysis, tumor budding served as a significant independent prognosticator for worse outcomes in overall and recurrence-free survival (HR 2.376 and 2.736, p < 0.001), but not when the TCGA subgroups entered into the analysis. In consequence, dependency had to be clarified in the subgroup analysis for Polymerase E mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair deficient (MMRdef), nonspecific mutation profile (NSMP), and P53 aberrant (P53abn) endometrial carcinomas. A particular impact was identified in the intermediate prognostic groups of NSMP and MMRdef carcinomas. Tumor budding outperformed the MELF pattern in single and combined prognostic information. In conclusion, the presence of tumor budding alone is a promising, robust, and easy-to-apply prognostic parameter in endometrial carcinoma. In a morpho-molecular approach, it exerts its prognostic potential in the most clinically relevant subgroups of endometrial carcinoma and serves as a good biomarker for EMT.

Indexed as

Cell MovementMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarcinomaDNA Mutational AnalysisEndometrial NeoplasmsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32728223
OpenAlexW3045554089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.