Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727868›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2020

Reducing time to complete neuropsychological assessments within a memory assessment service and evaluating the wider impact.

Helen Donovan, Emma Ellis, Laura Cole, Emma Townsend, Alejandra Cases

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical value of Alzheimer's disease biomarker testing.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helen DonovanBedfordshire and Luton Mental Health Services, East London NHS Foundation Trust, Bedfordshire, UK helen.donovan6@nhs.net.
Emma EllisBedfordshire and Luton Mental Health Services, East London NHS Foundation Trust, Bedfordshire, UK.
Laura ColeClinical Psychology Doctorate Programme, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Emma TownsendClinical Psychology Doctorate Programme, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Alejandra CasesSlough Older People's Mental Health Service, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Slough, UK.
East London NHS Foundation Trust · GBBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, the Older People's Mental Health Service (OPMHS) within Bedfordshire and Luton (provided by East London Foundation National Health Service Trust) faced considerable challenges in providing an accessible service for assessment of suspected dementia. Those referred to the Memory Assessment Service (MAS) encountered waiting times exceeding national recommendations. A quality improvement (QI) project was initiated by OPMHS Psychologists within all four multidisciplinary MAS clinics in Bedfordshire and Luton. The project aimed to reduce the time from the date of referral for within-team neuropsychological assessment to finalisation of the report to 6 weeks (42 days) by April 2017. In parallel to the initiative, the wider impact of the QI project was investigated. Through the combination of change ideas tested and implemented, all four MAS clinics were successful in meeting the primary project aim. The combined mean time between referral received by psychology and report finalised reduced by 28.76 days from 65.1 to 36.34 days, and with reduced variation across the clinics. These changes were sustained throughout the duration of the project and beyond, and successful change ideas were incorporated into routine practice with control methods developed. Exploring the wider impact, a focus group with six psychology staff members involved in the project was also completed. Thematic analysis identified three themes from the focus group: staff impact, service impact and service user impact. Further subthemes were identified regarding both desirable and undesirable impact across the system. The approaches used may be useful for other services embarking on reduced wait time initiatives for access to care. Additionally, understanding ongoing areas of impact on staff, the wider service and service users can help reduce or mitigate undesirable or unintended consequences and work towards sustainability of such changes.

Indexed as

MemoryTime FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLondonMaleNeuropsychological TestsQualitative ResearchQuality Improvementcontrol charts/run chartsdementiaprocess mappingwaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID32727868
PMCPMC7394246
OpenAlexW3045857261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.