Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727861›Full record

ArticlemSphere2020

Implementation of Antibody Rapid Diagnostic Testing versus Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Sample Pooling in the Screening of COVID-19: a Case of Different Testing Strategies in Africa.

Tinashe K Nyazika, Rabelani Kaela, Mathias Mugoni, Kudakwashe Musomekwa, Eric Kyei-Baafour, Simbarashe Chiwanda, Prichard T Mapondera, Tatenda S Makawa, Elliot M Sithole, George Mavunganidze and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tinashe K NyazikaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi tknyazika@mlw.mw.ORCID 0000-0003-0367-4265
Rabelani KaelaAfrican Society of Laboratory Medicine, PHIA Lab Corps, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mathias MugoniDepartment of Microbiology, Optimum Health Medical Laboratories, Gaborone, Botswana.
Kudakwashe MusomekwaAids Healthcare Foundation, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Eric Kyei-BaafourDepartment of Immunology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Simbarashe ChiwandaDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Prichard T MaponderaAfrican Society of Laboratory Medicine, PHIA Lab Corps, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tatenda S MakawaDepartment of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Elliot M SitholeDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom.
George MavunganidzeZimbabwe Association of Medical Laboratory and Clinical Scientists, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Justen ManasaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kondwani C JamboMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-2210
Cuthbert MusarurwaDepartment of Chemical Pathology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T008822/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101113/Z/13/Z084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has wreaked havoc across the globe; although the number of cases in Africa remains lower than in other regions, it is on a gradual upward trajectory. To date, COVID-19 cases have been reported in 54 out of 55 African countries. However, due to limited severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) testing capacity and scarcity of testing reagents, it is probable that the total number of cases could far exceed published statistics. In this viewpoint, using Ghana, Malawi, South Africa, and Zimbabwe as examples of countries that have implemented different testing strategies, we argue that the implementation of sample pooling for rRT-PCR over antibody rapid diagnostic testing could have a greater impact in assessing disease burden. Sample pooling offers huge advantages compared to single test rRT-PCR, as it reduces diagnostic costs, personnel time, burnout, and analytical run times. Africa is already strained in terms of testing resources for COVID-19; hence, cheaper alternative ways need to be implemented to conserve resources, maximize mass testing, and reduce transmission in the wider population.

Indexed as

AfricaClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesDeveloping CountriesHealth Care CostsHumansImmunoassayPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSerologic TestsSpecimen HandlingCOVID-19 VaccinesAfricaantibody rapid diagnostic testCOVID-19rRT-PCRsample pooling

Identifiers

PMID32727861
PMCPMC7392544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.