Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727614›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2020

Self-reflection and screening mental health on Canadian campuses: validation of the mental health continuum model.

Shu-Ping Chen, Wen-Pin Chang, Heather Stuart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shu-Ping ChenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-30 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G4, Canada. shuping2@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-5132
Wen-Pin ChangIndiana University (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Heather StuartQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USQueen's University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Movember Foundation MH001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study describes the psychometric testing of the Mental Health Continuum (MHC) model the Canadian Department of National Defense developed initially, among undergraduates of three Canadian universities. The MHC is a tool that consists of 6 items to guide students the way to attend to, or monitor, signs and behavior indicators of their mental health status and suggest appropriate actions to improve their mental health.

methodsOnline survey data were collected from 4206 undergraduate students in three universities in two Canadian provinces during the spring of 2015 and winter of 2016. Participants completed an online survey questionnaire that consisted of the MHC questionnaire, the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), and demographic information, including age, gender, and year of study.

resultsFactor analysis using the principal components method followed by a two-step internal replication analysis showed that the MHC tool was two-dimensional and that all six domains assessed were crucial. The construct (convergent) validity of the MHC tool was tested against the K-10, and the correlation analysis results were strong overall, as well as within subgroups defined by gender, year of study, and university.

conclusionsThe MHC is a useful tool that helps college students reflect on and enhance their mental health.

Indexed as

Mental HealthStudentsUniversitiesCanadaFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and Questionnairesde-stigmatizationMental health continuumPrevention

Identifiers

PMID32727614
PMCPMC7391623
OpenAlexW3045833340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.