Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727514›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020

The generic Informed Consent Service gICS

Henriette Rau, Lars Geidel, Martin Bialke, Arne Blumentritt, Martin Langanke, Wenke Liedtke, Sandra Pasewald, Dana Stahl, Thomas Bahls, Christian Maier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Henriette RauTrusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. henriette.rau@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0816-0693
Lars GeidelTrusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Martin BialkeInstitute for Community Medicine Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Arne BlumentrittTrusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Martin LangankeProtestant University of Applied Sciences in Bochum, Immanuel-Kant-Str. 18-20, 44803, Bochum, Germany.
Wenke LiedtkeFaculty of Theology, University of Greifswald, Am Rubenowplatz 2-3, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Sandra PasewaldTrusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Dana StahlTrusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Thomas BahlsInstitute for Community Medicine Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Christian MaierChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Wetterkreuz 13, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich ProkoschChair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Wetterkreuz 13, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitute for Community Medicine Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefining and protecting participants' rights is the aim of several ethical codices and legal regulations. According to these regulations, the Informed Consent (IC) is an inevitable element of research with human subjects. In the era of "big data medicine", aspects of IC become even more relevant since research becomes more complex rendering compliance with legal and ethical regulations increasingly difficult.

methodsBased on literature research and practical experiences gathered by the Institute for Community Medicine (ICM), University Medicine Greifswald, requirements for digital consent management systems were identified.

resultsTo address the requirements, the free-of-charge, open-source software "generic Informed Consent Service" (gICS DISCUSSION: Since the consent's content is a prerequisite for securing participants' rights, application of gICS is no guarantee for legal compliance. However, gICS supports fine-granular consents and accommodation of differentiated consent states, which can be directly exchanged between systems, allowing automated data processing.

conclusiongICS simplifies and supports sustained IC management as a major key to successfully conduct studies and build trust in research with human subjects. Therefore, interested researchers are invited to use gICS and provide feedback for further improvements.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentSoftwareElectronicsHumansResearch DesignResearch PersonnelConsent managementGDPRGeneral data protection regulationInformed consent

Identifiers

PMID32727514
PMCPMC7391490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.