Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727493›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2020

Implementation of family psychosocial risk assessment in pediatric cancer with the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT): study protocol for a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

Anne E Kazak, Janet A Deatrick, Michele A Scialla, Eric Sandler, Rebecca E Madden, Lamia P Barakat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04446728 (Implementation of Family Psychosocial Risk Assessment in Pediatric Cancer With The Psychosocial Assessment Tool), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04446728 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Family Psychosocial Risk Assessment in Pediatric Cancer With The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNemours Children's ClinicRan2021 to 2026Enrolled18ConditionsPediatric CancerArmsTraining Webinar, Training Webinar Plus Implementation Enhanced Resources (TIER)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E KazakNemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, DE, USA. anne.kazak@nemours.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-0855
Janet A DeatrickUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michele A SciallaA.I. du Pont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Eric SandlerNemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Rebecca E MaddenThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lamia P BarakatThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USNemours Children’s Clinic · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood cancer affects and is affected by multiple levels of the social ecology, including social and relational determinants of health (e.g., economic stability, housing, childcare, healthcare access, child and family problems). The 2015 Standards of Psychosocial Care in Pediatric Cancer outline optimal psychosocial care sensitive to these ecological factors, starting with assessment of psychosocial healthcare needs to promote medical and psychosocial outcomes across all children with cancer. To address the first standard of family psychosocial assessment, the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a validated screener ready for broad implementation.

methodThe PAT will be implemented across a national sample of 18 pediatric cancer programs ranging in size (annual new patients) in a mixed methods, comparative effectiveness study, guided by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, comparing two implementation strategies. It is hypothesized that implementation will be more successful at the patient/family, provider, and institutional level when training (strategy I) is combined with implementation expanded resources (strategy II). There are three aims: (1) Refine the two implementation strategies using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 19 stakeholders including parent advocates, providers, pediatric oncology organization representatives, healthcare industry leaders; (2) Compare the two theoretically based and empirically informed strategies to implement the PAT in English and Spanish using a cluster-randomized controlled trial across 18 sites. Stratified by size, sites will be randomized to cohort (3) and strategy (2). Outcomes include adoption and penetration of screening (patient/family), staff job satisfaction/burnout (provider), and cost-effective use of resources consistent with family risk (institution); (3) Based on the results of the trial and feedback from the first and second aim, we will develop and disseminate a web-based PAT Implementation Toolkit. DISCUSSION: Use of the PAT across children's cancer programs nationally can achieve the assessment standard and inform equitable delivery of psychosocial care matched to family need for all patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04446728 , registered 23 June 2020.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsChildChild HealthFamilyHumansParentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentFamiliesImplementationPediatric cancerPsychosocialRiskScreening

Identifiers

PMID32727493
PMCPMC7391817
OpenAlexW3046050425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.