Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727462›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Knowledge, attitude and practice of emergency contraceptive pills among community pharmacy practitioners working in Kathmandu Valley: a cross-sectional study.

Sujyoti Shakya, Sweta Shrestha, Rojeena Koju Shrestha, Usha Giri, Sunil Shrestha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sujyoti ShakyaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Science, Nobel College, Affiliated to Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal. ssujyoti@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-0281
Sweta ShresthaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Sciences, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal. sweta.shrestha@ku.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-2645
Rojeena Koju ShresthaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Sciences, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
Usha GiriDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Sciences, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
Sunil ShresthaDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Health Service Research, Nepal Health Research and Innovation Foundation, Lalitpur, Nepal. sunilcresta@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-7120
Pokhara University · NPKathmandu University · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended pregnancy occurs due to incorrect or inconsistent use of a contraception method. Such pregnancies can create an economic burden on the family, society and nation as a whole. Unintended pregnancy is the underlying cause of abortion which can also result in infertility and maternal death. Adequate knowledge of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) and positive attitudes among the community pharmacy practitioners (CPPs) is a prerequisite for timely access of ECP, thus ultimately lessening the incidence of unintended pregnancies. This study intended to explore the knowledge, attitude and practice of CPPs toward ECPs in Kathmandu valley.

methodsCross-sectional study conducted in community pharmacies located in three districts of Kathmandu valley. A convenience sampling method was employed to interview CPPs in 227 community pharmacies using a validated questionnaire. Questionnaire assessed the demographic characteristics; knowledge, attitude and dispensing practice of the CPPs. Data were subjected to descriptive and inferential analysis using SPSS 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

resultsApproximately 75% of respondents had a good practice on dispensing ECPs, and 70% of them counselled all the users. A significant association (p-value< 0.05) was obtained between the dispensing practice of respondents and their knowledge level. ECP related knowledge was higher among the age group 40-49 years, BPharm degree holders with experience above 10 years and community pharmacies located inside the city and in the Kathmandu district. After adjusting the possible confounder variables, age, degree and district of pharmacy were significantly associated with knowledge. Similarly, respondents' practice towards ECP was higher among the age group 40-49 years with experience above 10 years and community pharmacies located inside the city and in the Kathmandu district. Adjusted for other variables, only community pharmacies located at Kathmandu district was significantly associated with the practice.

conclusionCPPs lacked specific important information on ECP and opined against its' availability as an over-the-counter drug, despite good overall knowledge and positive attitude. Many thought that ECP without prescription would increase promiscuity towards sexual behaviour and result in unsafe sex along with its' repeated use. Hence, training and proper counselling strategies should be afoot to refine the delivery of service by CPPs.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, PostcoitalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultChicagoCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansNonprescription DrugsPharmaciesPharmacistsSurveys and QuestionnairesContraceptives, PostcoitalNonprescription DrugsCommunity pharmacyEmergency contraceptionEmergency contraceptive pillsNepalPharmacist

Identifiers

PMID32727462
PMCPMC7392703
OpenAlexW3045667306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.