Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727455›Full record

ReviewRespiratory research2020

Tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a review of clinical development.

Antonio Anzueto, Marc Miravitlles

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06170125 (A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Observational Clinical Trial to Assess the Quality of Life in Patients With ChRonic ObstructIve Pulmonary Disease Who Require Tiotropium as additiOnal treatmeNt.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06170125 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Observational Clinical Trial to Assess the Quality of Life in Patients With ChRonic ObstructIve Pulmonary Disease Who Require Tiotropium as additiOnal treatmeNt.

TypeobservationalSponsorElpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsCOPDArmsTiotropium treated patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Outstanding Contributions to Aerosol Pulmonary Drug Delivery.Kona : powder science and technology in Japan · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. APurinergic signalling · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Efficacy of a Self-Designed Questionnaire for Community Screening of COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio AnzuetoInternal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, University of Texas Health, and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA. anzueto@uthscsa.edu.
Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitary Vall d'Hebron/Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR). CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain.
South Texas Veterans Health Care System · USVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchodilators are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy is recommended as initial treatment for Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) groups B, C, and D. MAIN BODY: Tiotropium bromide was the first LAMA available for COPD in clinical practice and, because of its long duration of action, is administered once daily. Tiotropium was initially available as an inhalation powder delivered via a dry-powder inhaler (DPI). Later, tiotropium also became available as an inhalation spray delivered via a soft mist inhaler (SMI). The SMI was designed to overcome or minimize some of the issues associated with other inhaler types (eg, the need for strong inspiratory airflow with DPIs). Results of short- and long-term randomized, controlled clinical trials of tiotropium in patients with COPD indicated tiotropium was safe and significantly improved lung function, health-related quality of life, and exercise endurance, and reduced dyspnea, lung hyperinflation, exacerbations, and use of rescue medication compared with placebo or active comparators. These positive efficacy findings triggered the evaluation of tiotropium in fixed-dose combination with olodaterol (a long-acting β

conclusionTiotropium is safe and efficacious as a long-term, once-daily LAMA for the maintenance treatment of COPD and for reducing COPD exacerbations. The SMI generates a low-velocity, long-duration aerosol spray with a high fine-particle fraction, which results in marked lung drug deposition. In addition, high inspiratory flow rates are not required.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationBronchodilator AgentsDrug DevelopmentForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMuscarinic AntagonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTiotropium BromideBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic AntagonistsTiotropium BromideChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseDry-powder inhalerDyspneaExacerbationsHandiHaler®Long-acting muscarinic antagonistLung functionRespimat®Soft mist inhalerTiotropium

Identifiers

PMID32727455
PMCPMC7389564
OpenAlexW3046024349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.