ArticleBMC health services research2020
Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient participation in self-monitoring regarding healthcare of heart failure: an integrated systematic review.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of an interactive web-based support system via mobile phone on preference-based patient participation in patients living with hypertension - a randomized controlled trial in primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Trial
- Considering Preference-Based Patient Participation-Scientific and Clinical Outcome Measures With the Patient Preferences for Patient Participation Tool.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Entangled in complexity: An ethnographic study of organizational adaptability and safe care transitions for patients with complex care needs.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Patient participation-18 months of patient and staff perspectives in kidney care: A mixed methods study addressing the effects of facilitating staff person-centredness.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The effect of patient participation on trust in primary health care physicians among patients with chronic diseases: the mediating role of perceived value.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Translation and psychometric validation of the Patient Participation Culture Tool for healthcare workers in Chinese nursing context.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- To become part of the team-patient experiences of participating in decision-making for a new treatment (proton beam therapy).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Experiences of co-producing person-centred and cohesive clinical pathways in the national system for knowledge-based management in Swedish healthcare: a qualitative study.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Two variants of 'constrained participation' in the care of vulnerable adults: A proof-of-concept study.Nursing ethics · 2024Article
- Patient participation in end-stage kidney disease care: variation over time and effects of staff-directed interventions - a quasi-experimental study.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Patient preferences and experiences of participation in surgical cancer care.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2022Article
- Patients' Experiences of Care With or Without the Support of an Interactive App During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Interview Study.JMIR nursing · 2022Article
- Preference-based patient participation for most, if not all: A cross-sectional study of patient participation amongst persons with end-stage kidney disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Conceptualizing patient participation in psychiatry: A survey describing the voice of patients in outpatient care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation, OPTION-a study protocol for a randomised trial by a multi-professional facilitator team and their first-line managers' implementation strategy.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- The Impact of Chronic Illness on the Patient Experience: Results From a Cross-Sectional Comparative Study in a Comprehensive Tertiary Hospital in China.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Patient Participation in Home Care: A Longitudinal Exploration of Experiencing, Refraining, and Losing Involvement.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough patient participation is strongly associated with high quality of healthcare, valid means to measure and report a comprehensive notion of patient participation are scarce. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation (4Ps) is a new healthcare practice and research tool, comprising patients' preferences as well as experiences. The 4Ps employs 12 items for the patient to conceptualise patient participation. The aim of this paper is to describe how the two perspectives of patient participation, namely preferences and experiences, can be combined to visualise and report preference-based patient participation.
methodsWith four response alternatives in each section, the 4Ps offers sixteen possible combinations of degree of match per item. Theoretical and clinical principles fostered a tentative order of six ranks and three levels of preference-based patient participation. To test the standard, statistical analyses for ordinal data were performed, using data from a randomised controlled trial evaluating an intervention aiming to improve patient participation. Further, structures for visualising the preference-based patient participation of individuals and groups were suggested.
resultsData from the 4Ps demonstrated the individuals' preference-based patient participation, indicating either a match or a mismatch for each item. Mismatches represented either the experience of participation surpassing the patient's preferences, or the patient's preferences for patient participation not being established. At group level, the suggested approach for visualising and reporting the 4Ps demonstrated that the intervention group had a significantly higher proportion of sufficient preference-based patient participation for certain items than the control group. These results had not been identified earlier, when using the preferences and experiences of patient participation as separate measures.
conclusionsWays to easily acquaint stakeholders with patients' preferences for patient participation are needed, in order for healthcare staff to better use resources to match the basic requirements of individuals and groups. While the 4Ps can guide professionals to patient participation as framed in legislations, concept analyses and by patients, a visualisation of the results is needed to capture preference-based patient participation. The proposed route to representing degree of match in preferences and experiences may also be relevant to other dimensions of quality of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.