Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727435›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Underestimation of pregnancy risk among women in Vietnam.

Jessica Londeree, Nghia Nguyen, Linh H Nguyen, Dung H Tran, Maria F Gallo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica LondereeDivision of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Nghia NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vinmec International Hospital, 458 Minh Khai, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Linh H NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vinmec International Hospital, 458 Minh Khai, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Dung H TranDepartment of Research and Training, Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, La Thanh Street, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Maria F GalloDivision of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. gallo.86@osu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-0544
The Ohio State University · USVinmec International Hospital · VN

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
Gates Foundation OPP1171894NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing women's inaccurate perceptions of their risk of pregnancy is crucial to improve contraceptive uptake and adherence. Few studies, though, have evaluated the factors associated with underestimation of pregnancy risk among women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

methodsWe assessed the association between demographic and behavioral characteristics and underestimating pregnancy risk among reproductive-age, sexually-active women in Hanoi, Vietnam who did not desire pregnancy and yet were not using highly-effective contraception (N = 237). We dichotomized women into those who underestimated pregnancy likelihood (i.e., 'very unlikely' they would become pregnant in the next year), and those who did not underestimate pregnancy likelihood (i.e., 'somewhat unlikely,' 'somewhat likely' or 'very likely'). We used bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models to identify correlates of underestimating pregnancy risk.

resultsOverall, 67.9% (n = 166) of women underestimated their pregnancy risk. In bivariable analysis, underestimation of pregnancy risk was greater among women who were older (> 30 years), who lived in a town or rural area, and who reported that it was "very important" or "important" to them to not become pregnant in the next year. In multivariable analysis, importance of avoiding pregnancy was the sole factor that remained statistically significantly associated with underestimating pregnancy risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.25). In contrast, pregnancy risk underestimation did appear to vary by marital status, ethnicity, education or other behaviors and beliefs relating to contraceptive use.

conclusionsFindings reinforce the need to address inaccurate perceptions of pregnancy risk among women at risk of experiencing an unintended pregnancy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnancy, UnplannedAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorEthnicityFemaleHumansPregnancyVietnamContraceptionHealth knowledge, attitudes, practicePregnancy, unplannedRisk assessmentVietnam

Identifiers

PMID32727435
PMCPMC7388449
OpenAlexW3045795485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.