Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727421›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Impact of implementation of a breech clinic in a tertiary hospital.

S Derisbourg, E Costa, L De Luca, S Amirgholami, V Bogne Kamdem, A Vercoutere, W H Zhang, S Alexander, P M Buekens, Y Englert and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S DerisbourgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium. sara.derisbourg@erasme.ulb.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-5042
E CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
L De LucaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
S AmirgholamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
V Bogne KamdemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
A VercoutereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
W H ZhangResearch Laboratory for Human Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 597, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
S AlexanderPerinatal Epidemiology and Reproductive Health Unit, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Centre, Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium.
P M BuekensDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Y EnglertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
A PintiauxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
C DaelemansDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of breech presentation in single pregnancies at term is between three to 5 %. In order to support eligible women in their choice of mode of delivery, a dedicated breech clinic with a care pathway was developed in December 2015 in a tertiary referral centre in Brussels. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the vaginal birth rate before and after the introduction of a dedicated breech clinic. The secondary objective was to compare the early neonatal outcomes before and after the breech clinic was introduced.

methodsThis was a single centre retrospective and prospective study. The inclusion criteria were term (from 37 weeks), singleton fetus and breech presentation at delivery. The exclusion criteria were suspected intrauterine growth restriction, severe fetal malformations and intrauterine fetal demise. We used a composite outcome as an indicator of neonatal morbidity and mortality.

resultsAfter the introduction of the breech clinic, we observed a significant increase in planned vaginal delivery from 7.4% (12/162) to 53.0% (61/115) (OR: 13.5; 95% CI: 6.7-27.0). The effective vaginal breech delivery rate (planned and unexpected) significantly increased from 4.3% (7/162) pre-implementation of breech clinic to 43.5% (50/115) post-implementation (OR: 17.0; 95% CI: 7.3-39.6). Neonatal outcomes were not statistically different between the before and after periods.

conclusionThe introduction of a dedicated breech clinic has led to an increase in vaginal deliveries for breech babies without adversely affecting neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultApgar ScoreBelgiumBreech PresentationCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersBreech clinicBreech deliveryCare-pathwayMode of deliveryNeonatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID32727421
PMCPMC7391516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.