Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727375›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020

Genomic diversity and population structure of the indigenous Greek and Cypriot cattle populations.

Dimitris Papachristou, Panagiota Koutsouli, George P Laliotis, Elisabeth Kunz, Maulik Upadhyay, Doris Seichter, Ingolf Russ, Bunevski Gjoko, Nikolaos Kostaras, Iosif Bizelis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic characterization of the indigenous Cyprus cattle breed.Tropical animal health and production · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dimitris PapachristouLaboratory of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Production, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855, Athens, Greece.
Panagiota KoutsouliLaboratory of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Production, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855, Athens, Greece.
George P LaliotisLaboratory of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Production, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855, Athens, Greece.
Elisabeth KunzPopulation Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, Lena-Christ-Str. 48, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Maulik UpadhyayPopulation Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, Lena-Christ-Str. 48, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Doris SeichterTierzuchtforschung e.V. München, Senator-Gerauer-Str. 23, 85586, Poing, Germany.
Ingolf RussTierzuchtforschung e.V. München, Senator-Gerauer-Str. 23, 85586, Poing, Germany.
Bunevski GjokoLivestock Department, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food Institute of Animal Biotechnology, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, 16-ta Makedonska Brigada 3, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Nikolaos KostarasAMALTHIA, Network for the Protection of Greek Indigenous Farm Animals, 51 Argyrokastrou, 15669, Athens, Greece.
Iosif BizelisLaboratory of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Production, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos, 11855, Athens, Greece.
Ivica MedugoracPopulation Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, Lena-Christ-Str. 48, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. ivica.medjugorac@gen.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-3039
Agricultural University of Athens · GRLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESs. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje · MKUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 57418683FAO BUSHALIVE 299432Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation Fellowship:1301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe indigenous cattle populations from Greece and Cyprus have decreased to small numbers and are currently at risk of extinction due to socio-economic reasons, geographic isolation and crossbreeding with commercial breeds. This study represents the first comprehensive genome-wide analysis of 10 indigenous cattle populations from continental Greece and the Greek islands, and one from Cyprus, and compares them with 104 international breeds using more than 46,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

resultsWe estimated several parameters of genetic diversity (e.g. heterozygosity and allelic diversity) that indicated a severe loss of genetic diversity for the island populations compared to the mainland populations, which is mainly due to the declining size of their population in recent years and subsequent inbreeding. This high inbreeding status also resulted in higher genetic differentiation within the Greek and Cyprus cattle group compared to the remaining geographical breed groups. Supervised and unsupervised cluster analyses revealed that the phylogenetic patterns in the indigenous Greek breeds were consistent with their geographical origin and historical information regarding crosses with breeds of Anatolian or Balkan origin. Cyprus cattle showed a relatively high indicine ancestry. Greek island populations are placed close to the root of the tree as defined by Gir and the outgroup Yak, whereas the mainland breeds share a common historical origin with Buša. Unsupervised clustering and D-statistics analyses provided strong support for Bos indicus introgression in almost all the investigated local cattle breeds along the route from Anatolia up to the southern foothills of the Alps, as well as in most cattle breeds along the Apennine peninsula to the southern foothills of the Alps.

conclusionsAll investigated Cyprus and Greek breeds present complex mosaic genomes as a result of historical and recent admixture events between neighbor and well-separated breeds. While the contribution of some mainland breeds to the genetic diversity pool seems important, some island and fragmented mainland breeds suffer from a severe decline of population size and loss of alleles due to genetic drift. Conservation programs that are a compromise between what is feasible and what is desirable should focus not only on the still highly diverse mainland breeds but also promote and explore the conservation possibilities for island breeds.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsCattleCyprusGene FrequencyGenetic IntrogressionGreeceReproductive Isolation

Identifiers

PMID32727375
PMCPMC7391618
OpenAlexW3045628360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.