Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727371›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020

Modeling host-microbiome interactions for the prediction of meat quality and carcass composition traits in swine.

Piush Khanal, Christian Maltecca, Clint Schwab, Justin Fix, Matteo Bergamaschi, Francesco Tiezzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial and Genomic Information Synergistically Contribute to Predicting Swine Performance Across Production Systems.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On the holobiont 'predictome' of immunocompetence in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gut microbial profiles and the role in lipid metabolism in Shaziling pigs.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piush KhanalDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. pkhanal2@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1079-5102
Christian MalteccaDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Clint SchwabThe Maschhoffs LLC, Carlyle, IL, 62231, USA.
Justin FixThe Maschhoffs LLC, Carlyle, IL, 62231, USA.
Matteo BergamaschiDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Francesco TiezziDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objectives of this study were to evaluate genomic and microbial predictions of phenotypes for meat quality and carcass traits in swine, and to evaluate the contribution of host-microbiome interactions to the prediction. Data were collected from Duroc-sired three-way crossbred individuals (n = 1123) that were genotyped with a 60 k SNP chip. Phenotypic information and fecal 16S rRNA microbial sequences at three stages of growth (Wean, Mid-test, and Off-test) were available for all these individuals. We used fourfold cross-validation with animals grouped based on sire relatedness. Five models with three sets of predictors (full, informatively reduced, and randomly reduced) were evaluated. 'Full' included information from all genetic markers and all operational taxonomic units (OTU), while 'informatively reduced' and 'randomly reduced' represented a reduced number of markers and OTU based on significance preselection and random sampling, respectively. The baseline model included the fixed effects of dam line, sex and contemporary group and the random effect of pen. The other four models were constructed by including only genomic information, only microbiome information, both genomic and microbiome information, and microbiome and genomic information and their interaction.

resultsInclusion of microbiome information increased predictive ability of phenotype for most traits, in particular when microbiome information collected at a later growth stage was used. Inclusion of microbiome information resulted in higher accuracies and lower mean squared errors for fat-related traits (fat depth, belly weight, intramuscular fat and subjective marbling), objective color measures (Minolta a*, Minolta b* and Minolta L*) and carcass daily gain. Informative selection of markers increased predictive ability but decreasing the number of informatively reduced OTU did not improve model performance. The proportion of variation explained by the host-genome-by-microbiome interaction was highest for fat depth (~ 20% at Mid-test and Off-test) and shearing force (~ 20% consistently at Wean, Mid-test and Off-test), although the inclusion of the interaction term did not increase the accuracy of predictions significantly.

conclusionsThis study provides novel insight on the use of microbiome information for the phenotypic prediction of meat quality and carcass traits in swine. Inclusion of microbiome information in the model improved predictive ability of phenotypes for fat deposition and color traits whereas including a genome-by-microbiome term did not improve prediction accuracy significantly.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeQuantitative Trait, HeritableAnimalsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHost-Pathogen InteractionsMaleMetagenomeModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePork MeatRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32727371
PMCPMC7388461
OpenAlexW3045548617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.