Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727357›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Responses of leaf morphology, NSCs contents and C:N:P stoichiometry of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Schima superba to shading.

Qingqing Liu, Zhijun Huang, Zhengning Wang, Yanfang Chen, Zhumei Wen, Bo Liu, Mulualem Tigabu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adaptation strategies ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physiological and Structural Changes in Leaves ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Exogenous spermidine improved drought tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingqing LiuForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Zhijun HuangForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Zhengning WangForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yanfang ChenForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Zhumei WenForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Bo LiuForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China. liubo@fafu.edu.cn.
Mulualem TigabuForestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, People's Republic of China. Mulualem.Tigabu@ess.slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-1168
Fujian Business University · CNFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China National Natural Science Foundation of China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs), carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) are important energy source or nutrients for all plant growth and metabolism. To persist in shaded understory, saplings have to maintain the dynamic balance of carbon and nutrients, such as leaf NSCs, C, N and P. To improve understanding of the nutrient utilization strategies between shade-tolerant and shade-intolerant species, we therefore compared the leaf NSCs, C, N, P in response to shade between seedlings of shade-tolerant Schima superba and shade-intolerant Cunninghamia lanceolate. Shading treatments were created with five levels (0, 40, 60, 85, 95% shading degree) to determine the effect of shade on leaf NSCs contents and C:N:P stoichiometry characteristics.

resultsMean leaf area was significantly larger under 60% shading degree for C. lanceolata while maximum mean leaf area was observed under 85% shading degree for S. superba seedlings, whereas leaf mass per area decreased consistently with increasing shading degree in both species. In general, both species showed decreasing NSC, soluble sugar and starch contents with increasing shading degree. However shade-tolerant S. superba seedlings exhibited higher NSC, soluble sugar and starch content than shade-intolerant C. lanceolate. The soluble sugar/starch ratio of C. lanceolate decreased with increasing shading degree, whereas that of S. superb remained stable. Leaf C:N ratio decreased while N:P ratio increased with increasing shading degree; leaf C:P ratio was highest in 60% shading degree for C. lanceolata and in 40% shading degree for S. superba.

conclusionS. superba is better adapted to low light condition than C. lanceolata through enlarged leaf area and increased carbohydrate reserves that allow the plant to cope with low light stress. From mixed plantation viewpoint, it would be advisable to plant S. superba later once the canopy of C. lanceolata is well developed but allowing enough sunlight.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate MetabolismCarbonCunninghamiaNitrogenPhosphorusPlant LeavesSeedlingsStarchSunlightTheaceaeTreesCarbonNitrogenPhosphorusStarchCunninghamia lanceolateLight adaptationNon-structural carbohydrateSoluble sugarStarch

Identifiers

PMID32727357
PMCPMC7391624
OpenAlexW3045961400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.