Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727351›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Proteomic responses to progressive dehydration stress in leaves of chickpea seedlings.

Saeedreza Vessal, Mohammad Arefian, Kadambot H M Siddique

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of drought-tolerant chickpea genotypes (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PS II Subunit P inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The jojoba genome reveals wide divergence of the sex chromosomes in a dioecious plant.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saeedreza VessalResearch Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. vessal@um.ac.ir.
Mohammad ArefianPlant Biotechnology and Breeding Department, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChickpea is an important food legume crop with high protein levels that is widely grown in rainfed areas prone to drought stress. Using an integrated approach, we describe the relative changes in some physiological parameters and the proteome of a drought-tolerant (MCC537, T) and drought-sensitive (MCC806, S) chickpea genotype.

resultsUnder progressive dehydration stress, the T genotype relied on a higher relative leaf water content after 3 and 5 d (69.7 and 49.3%) than the S genotype (59.7 and 40.3%) to maintain photosynthetic activities and improve endurance under stress. This may have been facilitated by greater proline accumulation in the T genotype than the S genotype (14.3 and 11.1 μmol g

conclusionsThis study highlights the significance of genotype- and time-specific proteins associated with dehydration stress and identifies potential resources for molecular drought tolerance improvement in chickpea.

Indexed as

CicerDehydrationDroughtsPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsProteomicsSeedlingsStress, PhysiologicalPlant ProteinsChickpeaComparative proteomicsDehydration stressProline

Identifiers

PMID32727351
PMCPMC7392671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.