SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2021
Pharmacological Strategy for Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome with CHRNE Mutations: A Meta-Analysis of Case Reports.
Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological Treatments for Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes Caused byCurrent neuropharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Congenital Myopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Pragmatic Phenotype-Electrophysiology-Genomics Integration in Pediatric Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: Insights From 36 Patients in a Single-Center Study in China.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Diversity in Pediatric Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome: Insights from CHRNE and DPAGT1 Variants.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion inBiomedical reports · 2025Article
- Blood biomarker fingerprints in a cohort of patients with CHRNE-related congenital myasthenic syndrome.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Clinical and Pathologic Features of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes Caused by 35 Genes-A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinicopathological-genetic features of congenital myasthenic syndrome from a Chinese neuromuscular centre.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Reclassification of Hepatocellular Cancer With Neural-Related Genes.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Expanding the clinicopathological-genetic spectrum of GNE myopathy by a Chinese neuromuscular centre.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Repositive RT-PCR test in discharged COVID-19 patients during medical isolation observation.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital myasthenic syndromes (CMSs) are a heterogeneous group of neuromuscular disorders. Mutations of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor epsilon subunit gene (CHRNE) are the most common causes of these disorders. CMSs are gaining increasing recognition by clinicians. However, pharmacological treatment of CMS with CHRNE mutations has only been discussed in a small number of case reports.
objectiveThis study aims to determine how to choose an appropriate pharmacological strategy for CMS with CHRNE mutations.
methodsA meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published in English prior to June 1, 2020. The extracted data included clinical information, gene mutations, pharmacological treatment, and treatment effects.
resultsA total of 48 studies and 208 CMS patients with CHRNE mutations were included in our meta-analysis. Ten different pharmacological strategies were used in these patients. Our research found that β2-adrenergic receptor agonists had the best treatment effect for CMS patients with CHRNE mutations, especially in patients with primary AChR deficiency. In addition, our analysis found no evidence that age at disease onset influences the treatment results.
conclusionThis meta-analysis provides evidence that (1) β2-adrenergic receptor agonist therapy could be the first choice of pharmacological strategy for treating CMS with CHRNE mutations; (2) a single-drug-regime, rather than a combination therapy, should be the first choice of treatment; and (3) it is never too late to initiate pharmacological treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.