ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020
Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscle sympathetic single units can respond differentially to stress, but whether these responses are linked to the degree of sympathoexcitation is unclear. Fifty-three muscle sympathetic single units (microneurography) were recorded in 17 participants (8 women; 24 ± 3 yr). Five 40-s bouts of 10% static handgrip were performed during a 10-min forearm ischemia to progressively increase metabolite accumulation. Each static handgrip was separated by a 75-s ischemic rest [postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO)] to assess the isolated action of the muscle metaboreflex. During each set of PECO, individual single units were classified as activated, nonresponsive, or inhibited if the spike frequency was above, within, or below the baseline variability, respectively. From
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.