Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727263›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Monkeys and humans implement causal inference to simultaneously localize auditory and visual stimuli.

Jeff T Mohl, John M Pearson, Jennifer M Groh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Conserved features of eye movement related eardrum oscillations (EMREOs) across humans and monkeys.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Do you hear what I see? How do early blind individuals experience object motion?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeff T MohlDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-9223
John M PearsonDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-7837
Jennifer M GrohDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Spatial Information CodesR01DC016363 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GROH, JENNIFER M, TOKDAR, SURYA T · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environment is sampled by multiple senses, which are woven together to produce a unified perceptual state. However, optimally unifying such signals requires assigning particular signals to the same or different underlying objects or events. Many prior studies (especially in animals) have assumed fusion of cross-modal information, whereas recent work in humans has begun to probe the appropriateness of this assumption. Here we present results from a novel behavioral task in which both monkeys (

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAuditory PerceptionEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleSaccadesSound LocalizationSpace PerceptionThinkingVisual Perceptionbehavioral modelingbindingcausal inferencemultisensory processing

Identifiers

PMID32727263
PMCPMC7509303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.