Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727261›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Interocular velocity cues elicit vergence eye movements in mice.

Veronica Choi, Nicholas J Priebe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disparity Sensitivity and Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex Areas.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronica ChoiCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Nicholas J PriebeCenter for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Excitation and inhibition in visual processingR01EY025102 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRIEBE, NICHOLAS J · 2014 to 2023
$3.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025102NIH HHS EY025102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We stabilize the dynamic visual world on our retina by moving our eyes in response to motion signals. Coordinated movements between the two eyes are characterized as version when both eyes move in the same direction and vergence when the two eyes move in opposite directions. Vergence eye movements are necessary to track objects in three dimensions. In primates they can be elicited by intraocular differences in either spatial signals (disparity) or velocity, requiring the integration of left and right eye inputs. Whether mice are capable of similar behaviors is not known. To address this issue, we measured vergence eye movements in mice using a stereoscopic stimulus known to elicit vergence eye movements in primates. We found that mice also exhibit vergence eye movements, although at a low gain and that the primary driver of these vergence eye movements is interocular motion. Spatial disparity cues alone are ineffective. We also found that the vergence eye movements we observed in mice were robust to silencing visual cortex and to manipulations that disrupt the normal development of binocularity in visual cortex. A sublinear combination of motor commands driven by monocular signals is sufficient to account for our results.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCuesEye MovementsMiceMotion PerceptionSpace PerceptionVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual Cortexbinocularitydisparityinterocular velocityparvalbuminprimary visual cortex

Identifiers

PMID32727261
PMCPMC7500383
OpenAlexW3046882660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.