Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727083›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Prognostic Value of CXCR2 in Breast Cancer.

Florence Boissière-Michot, William Jacot, Julien Fraisse, Sophie Gourgou, Colin Timaxian, Gwendal Lazennec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CXCL2/CXCR2 pathway regulates CD169Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Florence Boissière-MichotInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Val d'Aurelle, 34298 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2431-5157
William JacotInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Val d'Aurelle, 34298 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-061X
Julien FraisseInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Val d'Aurelle, 34298 Montpellier, France.
Sophie GourgouInstitut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Val d'Aurelle, 34298 Montpellier, France.
Colin TimaxianCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), SYS2DIAG-ALCEDIAG, Cap delta, 1682 Rue de la Valsière, 34184 Montpellier, France.
Gwendal LazennecCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), SYS2DIAG-ALCEDIAG, Cap delta, 1682 Rue de la Valsière, 34184 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8522-1763
Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

ARC Fundation XLigue contre le caner X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment appears essential in cancer progression and chemokines are mediators of the communication between cancer cells and stromal cells. We have previously shown that the ligands of the chemokine receptor CXCR2 were expressed at higher levels in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). Our hypothesis was that CXCR2 expression could also be altered in breast cancer. Here, we have analyzed the potential role of CXCR2 in breast cancer in a retrospective cohort of 105 breast cancer patients. Expression of CXCR2, CD11b (a marker of granulocytes) and CD66b (a marker of neutrophils) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tumor samples. We demonstrated that CXCR2 stained mainly stromal cells and in particular neutrophils. CXCR2, CD11b and CD66b expression were correlated with high grade breast cancers. Moreover, TNBC displayed a higher expression of CXCR2, CD11b and CD66b than hormone receptor positive or Her2 positive tumors. High levels of CXCR2 and CD11b, but not CD66b, were associated with a higher infiltration of T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes. We also observed a correlation between CXCR2 and AP-1 activity. In univariate analyses, CXCR2, but not CD11b or CD66b, was associated with a lower risk of relapse; CXCR2 remained significant in multivariate analysis. Our data suggest that CXCR2 is a stromal marker of TNBC. However, higher levels of CXCR2 predicted a lower risk of relapse.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemokinesCXCR2cytokinesmacrophagesneutrophils

Identifiers

PMID32727083
PMCPMC7465124
OpenAlexW3045207873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.