Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32727080›Full record

ArticlePolymers2020

Comparative Study on Protein-Rich Electrospun Fibers for in Vitro Applications.

Iriczalli Cruz-Maya, Alessio Varesano, Claudia Vineis, Vincenzo Guarino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wool Keratin-Based Nanofibres-In Vitro Validation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Electrospun PCL-Based Vascular Grafts: In Vitro Tests.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iriczalli Cruz-MayaInstitute of Polymers, Composites and, Biomaterials-National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), V.le J.F. Kennedy 54, Mostra d'Oltremare, Pad. 20, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6366-3002
Alessio VaresanoIntelligent Systems and technologies for advanced manufacturing-National Research Council (STIIMA-CNR), C.so G. Pella 16, 13900 Biella, Italy.
Claudia VineisIntelligent Systems and technologies for advanced manufacturing-National Research Council (STIIMA-CNR), C.so G. Pella 16, 13900 Biella, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4670-5586
Vincenzo GuarinoInstitute of Polymers, Composites and, Biomaterials-National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), V.le J.F. Kennedy 54, Mostra d'Oltremare, Pad. 20, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-3721
National Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospinning is the leading technology to fabricate fibrous scaffolds that mimic the architecture of the extracellular matrix of natural tissues. In order to improve the biological response, a consolidated trend involves the blending of synthetic polymers with natural proteins to form protein-rich fibers that include selected biochemical cues able to more actively support in vitro cell interaction. In this study, we compared protein-rich fibers fabricated via electrospinning by the blending of poly ε-caprolactone (PCL) with three different proteins, i.e., gelatin, zein, and keratin, respectively. We demonstrated that the peculiar features of the proteins used significantly influence the morphological properties, in terms of fiber size and distribution. Moreover, keratin drastically enhances the fiber hydrophilicity (water contact angle equal to 44.3° ± 3.9°) with positive effects on cell interaction, as confirmed by the higher proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) until 7 days. By contrast, gelatin and zein not equally contribute to the fiber wettability (water contact angles equal to 95.2° ± 1.2° and 76.3° ± 4.0°, respectively) due to morphological constraints, i.e., broader fiber diameter distribution ascribable to the non-homogeneous presence of the protein along the fibers, or chemical constrains, i.e., large amount of non-polar amino acids. According to in vitro experimental studies, which included SEM and confocal microscopy analyses and vitality assay, we concluded that keratin is the most promising protein to be combined with PCL for the fabrication of biologically instructive fibers for in vitro applications.

Indexed as

cell materials interactionelectrospinninggelatinkeratinzein

Identifiers

PMID32727080
PMCPMC7463886
OpenAlexW3045061830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.